Re: [Interest] Qt5 and QtSolutions

2012-12-20 Thread BRM
lly happen. That's my best understanding of it. I'm not claiming to have insider knowledge; far from it - the Qt Service replacement is my first dive into contributing to Qt. Ben > From: 程梁 >To: Qt Interest >Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:59 PM >Subject: Re: [Interest]

Re: [Interest] Qt5 and QtSolutions

2012-12-20 Thread 程梁
20:33 -0800 > From: bm_witn...@yahoo.com > To: duane.heb...@group-upc.com; interest@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Interest] Qt5 and QtSolutions > > > From: Duane > > > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 12:35 PM > > Subject: [Interest] Qt5 and QtSolutions > &

Re: [Interest] Qt5 and QtSolutions

2012-12-20 Thread BRM
> From: Duane > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 12:35 PM > Subject: [Interest] Qt5 and QtSolutions > > Qt5 looks great.  Is there any intention to port the QtSolution over? > I'm particularly concerned with QSingleApplication and QService. > That depends. Qt

[Interest] Qt5 and QtSolutions

2012-12-20 Thread Duane
Qt5 looks great. Is there any intention to port the QtSolution over? I'm particularly concerned with QSingleApplication and QService. ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest