Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

On Tuesday 18 February 2025 04:46:08 Central European Standard Time David M. Cotter via Interest wrote: > My I ask, is there ANY chance that you’re considering GETTING RID of it?? > It is hard to make promises about the future, but no one have suggested or even considered that. Previous surveys

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

My I ask, is there ANY chance that you’re considering GETTING RID of it?? because i’m about to invest in using it for in-app purchase in my cross-platform app. i started with eSellerate, which had an SDK for both mac and windows. invested LOTS of time and energy integrating it. went well for se

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

Thanks a lot Andy, I'll have a closer look onto these. Right now we are using a Qt3D based solution for displaying physics simulations and motion capturing results. Cheers, Volker Am 15.02.2025 um 17:00 schrieb Andy: Volker: I investigated a bunch of options: OpenSceneGraph (or VulkanScene

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

Well, For us, something that is *not* GPL which was the problem for our application and license**. I would love to have used Qt3D, QtCharts but the GPL made that impossible. We use VTK for our 3D and 2D visualization needs. **I understand from a business perspective *why* those licenses are th

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

Volker: I investigated a bunch of options: OpenSceneGraph (or VulkanSceneGraph), bgfx, sokol, and Magnum. Magnum seems to fit my use-case: https://github.com/mosra/magnum Don't love all the templating, but otherwise I like it so far. Easy to integrate as a QOpenGLWidget & I think it provides

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

Hi Andy, Out of curiosity, what new or boring technology are you migrating your Qt3D to? Cheers, Volker Am 14.02.2025 um 16:00 schrieb Andy: Thanks Mike. I was actually doing something similar and moved away from it in favour of (more) self-containment! :-) I did have some success at mak

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

On Friday, 14 February 2025 08:42:56 Pacific Standard Time Andy wrote: > That's great news - thanks Allan. > > I look forward to getting rid of MSVC! Please note there are other places inside Qt that only enable certain features for MSVC (search for QT_CONFIG(cpp_winrt) in the sources). I don't

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

That's great news - thanks Allan. I look forward to getting rid of MSVC! --- Andy Maloney // https://asmaloney.com mastodon ~ @asmalo...@fosstodon.org On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:20 AM Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > On Thursday 13 February 2025 16:53:05 Cen

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

On Thursday 13 February 2025 16:53:05 Central European Standard Time Andy wrote: > Vladimir: > > Thanks for the survey. There wasn't a free-form comment section at the end > of the survey, but I had a couple of notes... > > I use QWebEngine for three things for my desktop application: (1) > disp

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

Thanks Mike. I was actually doing something similar and moved away from it in favour of (more) self-containment! :-) I did have some success at making a "litehtml widget" and could probably replace my docs using it, but I couldn't get the creation of PDFs working with it properly. I'm sure it cou

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

@Andy We went down this road years ago with the same issues as you with respect to running in a sensitive environment and having the extra process running. We eventually switched to using sphinx to generate our documentation, ship it as a non-compressed folder that has the HTML web site. We the

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

Vladimir: Thanks for the survey. There wasn't a free-form comment section at the end of the survey, but I had a couple of notes... I use QWebEngine for three things for my desktop application: (1) displaying my manual (built using the Qt help system), (2) displaying HTML reports I generate on the

[Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

Good morning all interested in Qt! Qt is conducting a user survey about Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView. We want to hear users' feedback to properly align the priorities for the development of these components. We would appreciate your input. If you use Qt WebEngine or Qt WebView, please take 15–20