[Interest] Qt Licensing and OpenSource

On 12/11/2017 06:44 AM, interest-requ...@qt-project.org wrote: Sales are there to sale stuff. Not to provide you free consultations about Open Source software, its licensing, etc. For these things you should use different communication channels: mailing lists and IRC. Your first statement would

Re: [Interest] Qt licensing and using qmake for non-Qt projects

On 13/03/15 23:11, Preet wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Guido Seifert > wrote: > > What compiler do you use? Do you ask the same questions when you > compile your code with the gcc? Or visual studio? > > Guido > > > No, but when you use a compiler dire

Re: [Interest] Qt licensing and using qmake for non-Qt projects

On Friday 13 March 2015 17:11:36 Preet wrote: > No, but when you use a compiler directly there's usually no stage where > interim code is added to the output if you don't explicitly specify it. I > realize that qmake ends up calling these compilers at the end anyways, but > I thought there might be

Re: [Interest] Qt licensing and using qmake for non-Qt projects

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Guido Seifert wrote: > What compiler do you use? Do you ask the same questions when you compile > your code with the gcc? Or visual studio? > > Guido > No, but when you use a compiler directly there's usually no stage where interim code is added to the output if

Re: [Interest] Qt licensing and using qmake for non-Qt projects

On Friday 13 March 2015 14:42:22 Preet wrote: > Hi, > > I tend to use QtCreator and qmake for all of my projects, even those that > don't use Qt. Something I haven't really considered is how the usage of > qmake might affect what I build with it from a licensing stand point. > > qmake uses mkspec

Re: [Interest] Qt licensing and using qmake for non-Qt projects

What compiler do you use? Do you ask the same questions when you compile your code with the gcc? Or visual studio? Guido > Hi, > > I tend to use QtCreator and qmake for all of my projects, even those that > don't use Qt. Something I haven't really considered is how the usage of > qmake might af

[Interest] Qt licensing and using qmake for non-Qt projects

Hi, I tend to use QtCreator and qmake for all of my projects, even those that don't use Qt. Something I haven't really considered is how the usage of qmake might affect what I build with it from a licensing stand point. qmake uses mkspecs, and (possibly?) other files from the qt source tree. On c

Re: [Interest] Qt Licensing

The licensing terms are available here: http://qt-project.org/products/licensing You can either use Qt freely under the LGPL, or with the commercial license offered by Digia (http://www.digia.com/en/Qt/License-Agreements/) which you need to purchase. On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Ankit Agarwal

Re: [Interest] Qt Licensing

Am Mon, 7 May 2012 11:02:37 +0530 schrieb Ankit Agarwal : > Hi, > > We are a group of software engineer building a software to be deployed > commercially at the client's locations in Windows platform. As I understand > that if we are using Qt4.8, then we may not have to buy the Qt Commercial > li

[Interest] Qt Licensing

Hi, We are a group of software engineer building a software to be deployed commercially at the client's locations in Windows platform. As I understand that if we are using Qt4.8, then we may not have to buy the Qt Commercial license. Please correct me if I am wrong. -- Regards, Ankit Agarwal