Re: [Interest] Qt 5.4.x QML Quick2 OSX STANDARD framework deployments

2015-05-11 Thread m...@rpzdesign.com
Oliver: Sorry I confused you. All testing is "in-house", but all the testers need an easy way to receive the latest changes in the core binary executable without downloading the ENTIRE self contained bundle each upgrade. (12+ MB over DropBox/Google Drive == SLOW) So it is possible to distribu

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.4.x QML Quick2 OSX STANDARD framework deployments

2015-05-11 Thread Till Oliver Knoll
> Am 10.05.2015 um 21:30 schrieb "rpzrpz...@gmail.com" : > > Oliver: > > I took your advice to heart. > > I think there is a happy middle ground using scripts. > > During in-house development, I can send everyone a given app with a > fully self contained bundle. Ultimately, this will satis

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.4.x QML Quick2 OSX STANDARD framework deployments

2015-05-10 Thread rpzrpz...@gmail.com
Oliver: I took your advice to heart. I think there is a happy middle ground using scripts. During in-house development, I can send everyone a given app with a fully self contained bundle. Ultimately, this will satisfy store requirements. But for in-house development, 2 script files can run m

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.4.x QML Quick2 OSX STANDARD framework deployments

2015-05-09 Thread m...@rpzdesign.com
Oliver: Yes, none of this will ever touch the store. "This is a fine approach". But how would you do it? This is today's project. (hopefully only this morning) Thanks, md On 5/9/2015 1:26 AM, Till Oliver Knoll wrote: > > > > >> Am 09.05.2015 um 03:01 schrieb mark diener : >> >> Found a refer

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.4.x QML Quick2 OSX STANDARD framework deployments documentation missing

2015-05-09 Thread Till Oliver Knoll
> Am 09.05.2015 um 03:01 schrieb mark diener : > > Found a reference to the issue to install into /Library/Qt directory and > install-name-tool : Just be aware that this is /very/ unusual for OS X apps to do: the expected way is really that each app bundle is self-contained and links agains

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.4.x QML Quick2 OSX STANDARD framework deployments documentation missing

2015-05-08 Thread mark diener
Found a reference to the issue to install into /Library/Qt directory and install-name-tool : http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19426604/deploy-multiple-apps-with-shared-private-qt-frameworks-on-os-x Also reference to: /Library/Frameworks. Could I install QT to /Library/Frameworks for sharing be

[Interest] Qt 5.4.x QML Quick2 OSX STANDARD framework deployments documentation missing

2015-05-08 Thread mark diener
Trying to follow: http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/osx-deployment.html >From the web site, "The latter option is good if you have many Qt applications and you want them use a single Qt framework rather than multiple versions of it." But the documentation seems fairly shallow to understand how to deploy a SI