.qt.io
From: Interest on behalf of Nikos Chantziaras
Sent: Saturday, 13 April 2019 8:00 AM
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Qt 5.10
https://blog.qt.io/blog/2019/04/11/updated-qt-installer-released
On 12/04/2019 21:05, Jérôme Godbout wrote:
> We h
https://blog.qt.io/blog/2019/04/11/updated-qt-installer-released
On 12/04/2019 21:05, Jérôme Godbout wrote:
We have a few application that was highly tested under Qt 5.10.1 and I
don’t plan to update the Qt version just yet. I have a new programmer
joining in and needed to compile it to run it
Hi,
We have a few application that was highly tested under Qt 5.10.1 and I don't
plan to update the Qt version just yet. I have a new programmer joining in and
needed to compile it to run it on his machine to add a mini feature but at my
surprise, the installer doesn't allow him to install 5.10
Jake,
Thanks for your feedback.
I was just trying to old the train for a few of my loyal customers. I praise
more for them then Apple for theirs! ;)
But that’s fine with me. I won’t go back below Qt 5.10 now.
Thanks once again for your prompt reply!
Best,
Nuno
> On 1 Feb 2018, at 17:14, Jak
32-bit iOS is dead (iOS 11 no longer supports it), so we dropped support for it.
iOS 12 and iPhone 11 (or whatever it may be called) should be arriving within
the year. Do you really expect many of your users to be running anything older
than an iPhone 5s? That's *very* many versions behind by n
Hi,
I have recently updated on of my apps to Qt 5.10 and I have also built it
against iOS 11 SDK.
I started having users complaining about not being able to run the app on 32
bit iOS devices.
I thought the problem was compiling it with iOS 11.
I have submitted another version where the binar
With the nice new Qt 5.10 support for QMetaObject::invokeMethod + lambda
is there any reason to use or prefer the "old" way:
QTimer::singleShot(0, receiver, someLambda);
over the new:
QMetaObject::invokeMethod(receiver, someLambda, Qt::QueuedConnection);
Tracing quickly the code, QTimer::single
Got it, thanks! And huge thanks to Konstantin for providing binaries
(especially for Windows) -- we're eager to test this out soon.
Best,
Kevin
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 3 de julho de 2017 09:42:24 PDT Kevin Ushey wrote:
> > As per:
> >
> > http
On segunda-feira, 3 de julho de 2017 09:42:24 PDT Kevin Ushey wrote:
> As per:
>
> http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2017-May/029795.html
>
> I'm very excited to see that work on QtWebKit has been revived. I'm curious
> as to whether there are concrete plans to incorporate QtWebKi
03.07.2017, 19:42, "Kevin Ushey" :As per: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2017-May/029795.html I'm very excited to see that work on QtWebKit has been revived. I'm curious as to whether there are concrete plans to incorporate QtWebKit with the next releases of Qt? If so, will the
As per:
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2017-May/029795.html
I'm very excited to see that work on QtWebKit has been revived. I'm curious
as to whether there are concrete plans to incorporate QtWebKit with the
next releases of Qt? If so, will these be made part of the Qt 5.10 bet
11 matches
Mail list logo
