On 6/18/2013 8:41 AM, André Somers wrote:
> Op 17-6-2013 19:07, Constantin Makshin schreef:
>>
>> 1) On Windows directories can have custom icons. Not 100% sure about
>> other platforms.
>>
>> 2) Directories have at least "last modification" timestamp which is
>> needed for the detailed view mode.
Op 17-6-2013 19:07, Constantin Makshin schreef:
1) On Windows directories can have custom icons. Not 100% sure about
other platforms.
2) Directories have at least "last modification" timestamp which is
needed for the detailed view mode. What approach is better -- get all
information at once
On 6/17/2013 1:07 PM, Constantin Makshin wrote:
> 1) On Windows directories can have custom icons. Not 100% sure about
> other platforms.
>
> 2) Directories have at least "last modification" timestamp which is
> needed for the detailed view mode. What approach is better -- get all
> information at
1) On Windows directories can have custom icons. Not 100% sure about other
platforms.
2) Directories have at least "last modification" timestamp which is needed
for the detailed view mode. What approach is better -- get all information
at once or quickly get names, deferring timestamp retrieval un
On 6/17/2013 10:09 AM, william.croc...@analog.com wrote:
> On 06/17/2013 09:57 AM, Duane wrote:
>> On 6/14/2013 5:06 PM, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
>>> Am 14.06.2013 um 23:02 schrieb Till Oliver
>>> Knoll:
>>>
That said, the Qt "cross-platform file dialog" is (was?) terribly slow
wit
On 06/17/2013 09:57 AM, Duane wrote:
> On 6/14/2013 5:06 PM, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
>> Am 14.06.2013 um 23:02 schrieb Till Oliver
>> Knoll:
>>
>>>
>>> That said, the Qt "cross-platform file dialog" is (was?) terribly slow with
>>> network mapped drives
>>
That's the price we pay for viewing th
On 6/15/2013 3:48 AM, Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Are you sure you are not compiling in debug mode?
> I use QFileDialog native (static) in my application, it's very fast to
> load, except in debug mode (where it takes a few seconds loading all
> dlls). Qt 4.8.1 under windows, ming
On 6/14/2013 5:06 PM, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
> Am 14.06.2013 um 23:02 schrieb Till Oliver Knoll:
>
>>
>> That said, the Qt "cross-platform file dialog" is (was?) terribly slow with
>> network mapped drives
>
> On Windows, I should add.
Yes, on Windows it's very slow. I would love to use the n
Hello,
Are you sure you are not compiling in debug mode?
I use QFileDialog native (static) in my application, it's very fast to
load, except in debug mode (where it takes a few seconds loading all dlls).
Qt 4.8.1 under windows, mingw compiler
Etienne
2013/6/14 Mojmír Svoboda
> Hello again,
>
Am 14.06.2013 um 23:02 schrieb Till Oliver Knoll :
>
> That said, the Qt "cross-platform file dialog" is (was?) terribly slow with
> network mapped drives
On Windows, I should add.
Cheers,
Oliver
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
ht
Am 14.06.2013 um 22:19 schrieb Duane :
> On 6/14/2013 3:01 PM, Andre Somers wrote:
>> Op 14-6-2013 19:27, Constantin Makshin schreef:
>>>
>>> Try non-static QFileDialog members -- it's more likely to ignore
>>> various system [shell] extensions.
>> And way less likely to look and feel anything cl
On 6/14/2013 3:01 PM, Andre Somers wrote:
> Op 14-6-2013 19:27, Constantin Makshin schreef:
>>
>> Try non-static QFileDialog members -- it's more likely to ignore
>> various system [shell] extensions.
>>
> And way less likely to look and feel anything close to what the user
> expects in a file dial
There's not much choice for Mojmir -- either non-native, but [likely to be]
fast, dialog or native, but with all that third-party stuff which makes
things slower than they are supposed to be. :-)
On Jun 14, 2013 11:01 PM, "Andre Somers" wrote:
> Op 14-6-2013 19:27, Constantin Makshin schreef:
>
Op 14-6-2013 19:27, Constantin Makshin schreef:
Try non-static QFileDialog members -- it's more likely to ignore
various system [shell] extensions.
And way less likely to look and feel anything close to what the user
expects in a file dialog on his platform... At least, on windows, the Qt
f
Try non-static QFileDialog members -- it's more likely to ignore various
system [shell] extensions.
On Jun 14, 2013 3:11 PM, "Mojmír Svoboda"
wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> I tried to use QFileDialog for classic file selection, but
> it feels very sluggish, expecially the first time.
>
> I think it's
Hello again,
I tried to use QFileDialog for classic file selection, but
it feels very sluggish, expecially the first time.
I think it's due to heavy dll dependencies that are to be
loaded, in my case it makes ~85 dlls.
I wonder why of course and I'd like to know whether there
is some more lightw
16 matches
Mail list logo
