Re: [Interest] OT: Bug-free code (Was: QtSVG deprecated)

2012-01-12 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 12 de January de 2012 13.15.09, Atlant Schmidt wrote: > (Compiler/toolchain validation is a huge area > of very serious discussion.) For example, I've found a serious issue with the toolchain today, relating to Qt 5. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT)

Re: [Interest] OT: Bug-free code (Was: QtSVG deprecated)

2012-01-12 Thread Atlant Schmidt
st-bounces+aschmidt=dekaresearch@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Andreas Pakulat Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 11:19 To: interest@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Interest] OT: Bug-free code (Was: QtSVG deprecated) On 12.01.12 08:50:47, Atlant Schmidt wrote: > > > My over 20 years exp

Re: [Interest] OT: Bug-free code (Was: QtSVG deprecated)

2012-01-12 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 12.01.12 08:50:47, Atlant Schmidt wrote: > > > My over 20 years experience shows that there is no bug free software, > > > there are bugs that either have not being found yet or just ignored. > > > > Well, one example of a bug-free application would be > > > > int main() > > { > > return 0; >

Re: [Interest] OT: Bug-free code (Was: QtSVG deprecated)

2012-01-12 Thread Gopalakrishna Bhat
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Atlant Schmidt wrote: > > > My over 20 years experience shows that there is no bug free software, > > > there are bugs that either have not being found yet or just ignored. > > > > Well, one example of a bug-free application would be > > > > int main() > > { > >

[Interest] OT: Bug-free code (Was: QtSVG deprecated)

2012-01-12 Thread Atlant Schmidt
> > My over 20 years experience shows that there is no bug free software, > > there are bugs that either have not being found yet or just ignored. > > Well, one example of a bug-free application would be > > int main() > { > return 0; > } > > Sure it does not do anything useful, but its pretty mu