Thank you Konrad for the in-depth response, and also a shout to Andre. I
much appreciate it.
Now that I have a good idea of the current state, I must say I don't like
the fragmentation that has occurred. When Nokia was "in charge" the
LGPL/GPL was the same source as Commercial, and everything
Hi,
On Wednesday 13 June 2012 21:33:02 David Ching wrote:
> A couple days ago Turunen Tuukka from Digia responded to my question here
> about getting an SDK with Qt 4.8.2 in it by saying
>
> > There is no Qt Project SDK for 4.8 -
> > just the Nokia SDK and Qt Commercial SDK.
At the moment this i
You are missing that the baseline is free access to _the source code_
_and_ a well-defined, provably working, reasonably fast way to get
_your_ changes in, and influence the direction the whole thing goes with
_your_ ideas.
Points two and three are _quite_ different from what we had at Trolltech
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:33:02PM -0700, David Ching wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A couple days ago Turunen Tuukka from Digia responded to my question
> here about getting an SDK with Qt 4.8.2 in it by saying
>
> > There is no Qt Project SDK for 4.8 - just the Nokia SDK and Qt
> > Commercial SDK.
>
> Do
Hello,
A couple days ago Turunen Tuukka from Digia responded to my question here
about getting an SDK with Qt 4.8.2 in it by saying
> There is no Qt Project SDK for 4.8 -
> just the Nokia SDK and Qt Commercial SDK.
Does this mean there are two official SDK's now, and the commercial one is
diff
