something is missing).
--
Best Regards,
Andrei
From: nus1998
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 12:37 PM
To: Andrei Golubev
Cc: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re:Re: [Interest] Material controls memory usage
Hello,
I used the delta value by subtraction, as there is a base
tton count.
--
Best Regards,
Andrei
From: Interest on behalf of Mitch Curtis
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 11:09 AM
To: nus1998 ; interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Material controls memory usage
Hi.
> -Original Message-
> From: Interest On Behalf Of nus1998
>
021 11:09 AM
To: nus1998 ; interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Material controls memory usage
Hi.
> -Original Message-
> From: Interest On Behalf Of nus1998
> Sent: Tuesday, 11 May 2021 3:11 AM
> To: interest@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Interest] Material controls
Hi.
> -Original Message-
> From: Interest On Behalf Of nus1998
> Sent: Tuesday, 11 May 2021 3:11 AM
> To: interest@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Interest] Material controls memory usage
>
> Hi All,
>
> I made a simple comparison that it looks material controls
If its just virtual memory, it looks about right to me. Try Universal style, it
should lie in-between.
--
Frank
On 11.05.21 03:10, nus1998 wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I made a simple comparison that it looks material controls cost 70 times
> memory as normal quick controls, is it expected?
>
> my OS
Hi All,
I made a simple comparison that it looks material controls cost 70 times
memory as normal quick controls, is it expected?
my OS is win10 x64, with Qt 5.15.2 mingw64, here are the results:
|
button count
|
normal button memory usage(MB)
|
material button memory usage (MB)
|
|
100
|
