Re: [Interest] Licensing questions when using shared Qt-library on iOS

2018-05-16 Thread alexander golks
Am Wed, 16 May 2018 10:49:06 + schrieb "Trillmann, Jens" : > every other file in the platformplugin is LGPL licensed. From my > understanding I would violate the LGPL license if I would try to > distribute the app in this form, because a user could not easily swap > the provided Qt-library

Re: [Interest] Licensing questions when using shared Qt-library on iOS

2018-05-16 Thread Jean-Michaƫl Celerier
> From my understanding I would violate the LGPL license if I would try to distribute the app in this form, because a user could not easily swap the provided Qt-library with his own. The app itself is under the non-compatible EUPL. You can ship your app's .o files to allow other people to relink

[Interest] Licensing questions when using shared Qt-library on iOS

2018-05-16 Thread Trillmann, Jens
Hi, I'm currently trying to link our app on iOS dynamically against Qt. From the technical standpoint everything seems to be working, but I have a problem with the licensing. I would like to conform to the LGPL license, meaning that I want to link against all Qt parts dynamically, but I have t