> On 5 Dec 2016, at 14:32, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> 05.12.2016, 16:30, "Shawn Rutledge" :
>>> On 4 Dec 2016, at 18:17, Jason H wrote:
>>>
>>> I am trying a naive compile of Qt 5.7.0 (from source tarball) on a Pi zero
>>> (no cross compile) I've got all the dependencies installed and Jessi
05.12.2016, 16:30, "Shawn Rutledge" :
>> On 4 Dec 2016, at 18:17, Jason H wrote:
>>
>> I am trying a naive compile of Qt 5.7.0 (from source tarball) on a Pi zero
>> (no cross compile) I've got all the dependencies installed and Jessie is up
>> to date.
>> I keep running into GCC 4.9 compile
> On 4 Dec 2016, at 18:17, Jason H wrote:
>
> I am trying a naive compile of Qt 5.7.0 (from source tarball) on a Pi zero
> (no cross compile) I've got all the dependencies installed and Jessie is up
> to date.
> I keep running into GCC 4.9 compiler errors. Not that the Qt code is bad, but
> t
On domingo, 4 de dezembro de 2016 18:17:13 PST Jason H wrote:
> I am trying a naive compile of Qt 5.7.0 (from source tarball) on a Pi zero
> (no cross compile) I've got all the dependencies installed and Jessie is up
> to date. I keep running into GCC 4.9 compiler errors. Not that the Qt code
> is
04.12.2016, 20:17, "Jason H" :
> I am trying a naive compile of Qt 5.7.0 (from source tarball) on a Pi zero
> (no cross compile) I've got all the dependencies installed and Jessie is up
> to date.
> I keep running into GCC 4.9 compiler errors. Not that the Qt code is bad, but
> that the compil
I am trying a naive compile of Qt 5.7.0 (from source tarball) on a Pi zero (no
cross compile) I've got all the dependencies installed and Jessie is up to date.
I keep running into GCC 4.9 compiler errors. Not that the Qt code is bad, but
that the compiler bombs out saying it's a bug in GCC. Origi
