On 6/12/12 5:12 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On terça-feira, 12 de junho de 2012 15.16.38, Stephen Chu wrote:
>> I am curious if the runtime issue on OS X has been dealt with?
>
> Yes. We decided not to force libc++. We're still using the compiler default,
> whichever that is (currently libstdc++).
On terça-feira, 12 de junho de 2012 15.16.38, Stephen Chu wrote:
> I am curious if the runtime issue on OS X has been dealt with?
Yes. We decided not to force libc++. We're still using the compiler default,
whichever that is (currently libstdc++). If the compiler changes defaults, you
can blame th
On 6/11/12 10:49 PM, Rohan McGovern wrote:
> Stephen Chu said:
>> I just pulled Qt 5 from git and don't see the new C++11 option. They are
>> in the master branch of qtbase but Qt 5 doesn't pull that in yet.
>>
>
> Right, that's actually because it appears to have caused a few
> regressions. The ne
On 11.06.2012 23:06, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> They'll just have worse code generated. But if they're using compilers that
> are 3 years old or more, it's their own fault.
>
> Most embedded systems can use GCC 4.6 or even 4.7. Certainly the most common
> processors can.
Well, I think it doesn't mat
Stephen Chu said:
> I just pulled Qt 5 from git and don't see the new C++11 option. They are
> in the master branch of qtbase but Qt 5 doesn't pull that in yet.
>
Right, that's actually because it appears to have caused a few
regressions. The new qtbase will only arrive in qt5's git once all
kno
I just pulled Qt 5 from git and don't see the new C++11 option. They are
in the master branch of qtbase but Qt 5 doesn't pull that in yet.
Is this new C++11 option going to be in the final Qt 5 release?
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] C++11 in Qt5
You cannot build Qt with GCC 2.4.
On 12/06/12 00:19, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
> I would say almost all NEW embedded systems..
>
> However, I can tell you, I had a client last year stuck on gcc 2.4, because
> the CPU vendor who put out
On terça-feira, 12 de junho de 2012 02.06.35, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> 12.06.2012, 01:49, "Nikos Chantziaras" :
> > You cannot build Qt with GCC 2.4.
>
> Well, with 2.95 it's possible (after some patching)
Completely unsupported. Qt 4.0 was released with minimum support of 3.2 and
that was rais
12.06.2012, 01:49, "Nikos Chantziaras" :
> You cannot build Qt with GCC 2.4.
Well, with 2.95 it's possible (after some patching)
--
Regards,
Konstantin
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/int
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Rui Maciel wrote:
> On 06/11/2012 09:52 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> > I think there's a misunderstanding: C++11 support IS NOT required to
> > use or build Qt 5. If you have a recent compiler and enable C++11
> > support in Qt, then you get those nice ext
gt; Of Thiago Macieira
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 2:06 PM
> To: interest@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Interest] C++11 in Qt5
>
> On segunda-feira, 11 de junho de 2012 13.35.56, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
>> http://woboq.com/blog/cpp11-in-qt5.html
>>
>>
>>
&g
--Original Message-
From: interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs@qt-project.org
[mailto:interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
Thiago Macieira
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 2:06 PM
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] C++11 in Qt5
On segunda-fe
On 06/11/2012 09:52 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> I think there's a misunderstanding: C++11 support IS NOT required to
> use or build Qt 5. If you have a recent compiler and enable C++11
> support in Qt, then you get those nice extra features. Otherwise you
> don't. But you can still use Qt 5 with
On segunda-feira, 11 de junho de 2012 13.35.56, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
> http://woboq.com/blog/cpp11-in-qt5.html
>
>
>
> Can someone part of the Qt project, explain the reasoning for this...
>
> While in general I love the idea... In specific, I have had customers
> that are 5-10 years behind in t
On Jun 11, 2012, at 4:52 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> On 11 June 2012 21:35, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
>> Can someone part of the Qt project, explain the reasoning for this…
>>
>> While in general I love the idea… In specific, I have had customers that are
>> 5-10 years behind in their compiler
On 11 June 2012 21:35, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
> Can someone part of the Qt project, explain the reasoning for this…
>
> While in general I love the idea… In specific, I have had customers that are
> 5-10 years behind in their compiler choice..
>
> Usually in the embedded world, where the processo
On Jun 11, 2012, at 4:35 PM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
>
> http://woboq.com/blog/cpp11-in-qt5.html
>
> Can someone part of the Qt project, explain the reasoning for this…
>
> While in general I love the idea… In specific, I have had customers that are
> 5-10 years behind in their compiler ch
http://woboq.com/blog/cpp11-in-qt5.html
Can someone part of the Qt project, explain the reasoning for this...
While in general I love the idea... In specific, I have had customers
that are 5-10 years behind in their compiler choice..
Usually in the embedded world, where the processor doesn
18 matches
Mail list logo
