On 01/10/2013 07:22 PM, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 10 January 2013 09:38:49 Sergio Ahumada wrote:
>> On 01/10/2013 08:28 AM, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
> Since the function already receives as argument the address of
> oldMode, there is no need to do &oldMode when doing the
Hi,
On Thursday 10 January 2013 09:38:49 Sergio Ahumada wrote:
> On 01/10/2013 08:28 AM, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
> >>> Since the function already receives as argument the address of
> >>> oldMode, there is no need to do &oldMode when doing the ioctl() call.
> The master branch is gone. Please sub
On 01/10/2013 08:28 AM, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>>
>>> Since the function already receives as argument the address of
>>> oldMode, there is no need to do &oldMode when doing the ioctl() call.
>>
>>> This patch fixes the following segfault:
>> Thanks for the fix, but although it's trifial,
Hi,
On Wednesday 09 January 2013 23:48:42 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> On 9 January 2013 23:32, Thomas Petazzoni
> wrote:
> > The switchToGraphicsMode() function calls the KDGETMODE ioctl() call,
> > but passes the address of oldMode, which is already a
> > pointer. Therefore, the current code make
Hi Thomas,
On 9 January 2013 23:32, Thomas Petazzoni
wrote:
> The switchToGraphicsMode() function calls the KDGETMODE ioctl() call,
> but passes the address of oldMode, which is already a
> pointer. Therefore, the current code makes the kernel write the "mode"
> value returned by the KDGETMODE io
The switchToGraphicsMode() function calls the KDGETMODE ioctl() call,
but passes the address of oldMode, which is already a
pointer. Therefore, the current code makes the kernel write the "mode"
value returned by the KDGETMODE ioctl() at the address of the oldMode
pointer. This pointer becomes NULL
