Re: [Interest] Replacing icudtXX.dll without rebuilding Qt?

2016-01-17 Thread John Layt
On 17 January 2016 at 14:30, Elvis Stansvik wrote: > 2016-01-17 14:48 GMT+01:00 Elvis Stansvik : > > Hi all, > > > > In an effort to cut down on the size of the standalone ZIP > > distribution of my small command line tool [1] which only uses QtCore, > > and which to my knowledge does not depend

Re: [Interest] Display color managed image

2015-12-31 Thread John Layt
On 30 December 2015 at 22:25, Caio S. Souza wrote: > Hi! > I posted this question on the QT forum and recommended me to ask it in > the mailing list. I am developing an image manipulation app that must > be color managed. I have a pixel buffer with the colors already > converted to the display pr

Re: [Interest] Qt 5 Printer-specific options in QPrintDialog (Linux, CUPS)

2015-09-11 Thread John Layt
On 11 September 2015 at 13:37, Michael Weghorn wrote: > thank you very much for the quick reply. No problem, was lazily checking my mail on a Friday afternoon as I wind down at work... :-) > I estimate it quite a big issue in the migration to KDE 5/Qt 5 for us if > all those printer-specific op

Re: [Interest] Qt 5 Printer-specific options in QPrintDialog (Linux, CUPS)

2015-09-11 Thread John Layt
On 11 September 2015 at 11:42, Michael Weghorn wrote: > Or is this dialog not available on GNU/Linux and CUPS in Qt 5? Has it > possibly been removed in Qt 5? Hi, Yes, unfortunately it was a feature removed in Qt5 as the implementation was rather broken. The plan was to bring it back along with

Re: [Interest] Size of libQt5Core in 5.3

2014-05-11 Thread John Layt
On 11 May 2014 08:20, Daniel Bowen wrote: > Is there any way to get Qt Core to compile smaller, like under 3MB? Am I > missing anything to skip or “-no-xyz” or “-nomake” or “-no-feature”? Why is > libQt5Core.so.5.3.0 so much bigger than libQtCore4.so.4.8.4? I'll leave it for others to pass comm

Re: [Interest] OS X 5.3 beta - QPrintDialog does not open

2014-04-05 Thread John Layt
On 5 April 2014 16:47, Paul Miller wrote: > On 4/5/2014 6:56 AM, John Layt wrote: > > Are there any printers configured on your machine? If there are no > > printers installed then the dialog won't display, it's an issue we need > > to fix, but that normally out

Re: [Interest] OS X 5.3 beta - QPrintDialog does not open

2014-04-05 Thread John Layt
On 4 April 2014 17:30, Paul Miller wrote: > Anyone else seen any print-related issues on OS X? There are no errors > in the console, it just doesn't open. > > I've deployed QPrintSupport.framework and > plugins/printsupport/libcocoaprintersupport.dylib correctly, as far as I > can tell. > > I jus

Re: [Interest] QPrinter Support on Android

2013-11-11 Thread John Layt
On 11 November 2013 08:07, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On domingo, 10 de novembro de 2013 21:34:08, Joshua Grauman wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I just tried Qt5.2 for Android and unless I'm missing something I can't >> use QPrinter. Now I understand the reason for this, obviously there is no >> printer

Re: [Interest] Voice recogntion support in Qt5.x

2013-10-15 Thread John Layt
On 15 October 2013 12:42, Till Oliver Knoll wrote: > > Am 15.10.2013 um 12:10 schrieb Ramakanthreddy Kesireddy > > : > > > > Hi, > > > > Please let me know if there is any support for voice recognition in Qt 5.x? > > None. Depending on what you want to achieve, Simon from KDE may be an option htt

Re: [Interest] Advantage of Qt5 over Qt4 for C++/Widgets

2013-09-13 Thread John Layt
On 13 September 2013 16:44, Syam Krishnan wrote: > Hi > >We've been use Qt4 to create desktop applications on Linux written in > C++. > > My requirements: > 1. Need best possible performance from Qt - we always use C++ for coding > 2. Not interested in coding application logic in Javascript >

Re: [Interest] Oops! Somebody's got a bad case of dependency bloat!

2013-04-10 Thread John Layt
On 10 April 2013 13:14, Rainer Wiesenfarth wrote: > So, I do not need those if I configure Qt without webkit? > > ... ah, I forgot, there is a "-no-widgets" configure option, but no > "-no-webkit"... :-( > > On the contrary, as documented at http://qt-project.org/wiki/Building_Qt_5_from_Git under

Re: [Interest] Where do I find more info about calender system?

2013-01-09 Thread John Layt
On Monday 07 Jan 2013 23:59:45 Soroush Rabiei wrote: > Hi > > I'm interested in QCalenderSystem and its related concepts. I'm planning to > implement a third-party lib for Qt5 for Jalali calender. If possible, I > would like to integrate it to mainline Qt. > Only information I could find is this l

Re: [Interest] Getting the timezone from Qt?

2012-07-27 Thread John Layt
On 27 July 2012 08:33, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > Is there a way to get the current timezone in standard IANA format from > Qt? (Meaning a string like "America/New_York", "Europe/Paris", etc.) No, that's a feature not coming until Qt 5.1 :-\ Worse, you can't even get from Qt something to say wh

Re: [Interest] Is Nokia officially done with Qt?

2012-06-16 Thread John Layt
On 16 June 2012 09:43, Linos wrote: > El 16/06/12 10:27, Stefan Walter escribió: >> Let's wait for a proper official statement from Nokia about the future of Qt. >> >> Stop this desperate thoughts about forking Qt, because if Nokia will support >> it in the future or not will not change the exist

Re: [Interest] Why QString and not std::string?

2012-06-15 Thread John Layt
On 15 June 2012 15:39, Rui Maciel wrote: > On 06/15/2012 03:13 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: >>> >  But it's standard and it is C++. >> But (I think) the point was: what should have we used for the last >> 10-15 years of QString? > > I could've been a bit clearer in my initial post, but I intended

Re: [Interest] Is Nokia officially done with Qt?

2012-06-15 Thread John Layt
On 15 June 2012 15:11, Doogster wrote: > Here's an article that does specifically mention Qt: > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/06/14/nokia_software_purge/ > >    "Among the 10,000 casualties officially announced are teams working on >    Meltemi, Qt and QML. > >    So is it farewell for Qt an

Re: [Interest] Is Nokia officially done with Qt?

2012-06-14 Thread John Layt
On 14 June 2012 17:02, Harri Pasanen wrote: > If I read today's news correctly, Nokia is now done with Qt and all > developers were fired.  If so, thanks for the ride and all the best. > Such a pity. > > Which parts of Qt maintenance and development suffer most if it is > indeed so? > > Thanks, >

Re: [Interest] Working with QDateTime's timezone information

2012-06-13 Thread John Layt
On 12 June 2012 15:26, Jan Kundrát wrote: > So, the questions: > > - Is there a publicly available way of doing what I want to do, ie. am I > missing something? Almost certainly not. In KDE we implemented our own KDateTime and KTimeZone classes to handle it properly, although QDateTime is used

Re: [Interest] Working with QDateTime's timezone information

2012-06-13 Thread John Layt
On 13 June 2012 21:27, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote: > Hi, > > On Wednesday 13 June 2012 11:29:36 Christian Gagneraud wrote: >> Will Qt5 have better timezone support? > > 5.0.x - no, it has about the same features in QDateTime as Qt4.x > > 5.1.x - maybe, depends on whether anyone actually has time to in

Re: [Interest] Contributor agreement rundown

2012-04-18 Thread John Layt
On Wednesday 18 Apr 2012 03:55:19 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > I went to register for a Gerrit account. There I saw that I must agree > to a "contributor agreement". It's very legalese, so I'm not sure if it > means what I think it means: Nokia can transform open source code I > contribute into non

Re: [Interest] Wrong time format from QLocale

2012-03-23 Thread John Layt
On 22 March 2012 20:18, NoRulez wrote: > Hello @all, > > I want to use the date/time format from QLocale but I get a wrong result for > the short time format. > The following code: > > qDebug() << QLocale::system().timeFormat(QLocale::LongFormat); > > qDebug() << QLocale::system().timeFormat(QLoca