Re: [Interest] Backporting bugs to Qt 5.6

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 11:11 AM Alexandru Croitor wrote: > > You will probably want to read http://wiki.qt.io/Qt_Contribution_Guidelines > > And specifically to your questions, bug fixes first go to the current stable > brach of Qt (5.11.3 in this case), and once the patches are in, they can be

Re: [Interest] Backporting bugs to Qt 5.6

Thanks both, On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 10:45 PM Florian Bruhin wrote: > According to [1], Debian stable packages Qt 5.7.1 (which is not an LTS), > and testing/unstable both ship 5.11.1. Yes, you are absolutely right. I got the versions mixed up. > See [2]. The Qt 5.6 release was in March 2016, so

[Interest] Backporting bugs to Qt 5.6

ix is described in issue) https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-48344 (fixed in Qt 5.11) -- Kind Regards, Danny Smit ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Re: [Interest] QEventDispatcherGlib: timers don't timeout due to higher priority of socket notifier event dispatching

I'm not sure if this information helps, but please let me know if there is anything more that I can do that will help. -- Regards, Danny Smit ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

[Interest] QEventDispatcherGlib: timers don't timeout due to higher priority of socket notifier event dispatching.

implemented for a reason. But considering the side effects described above, it doesn't seem to work as expected. Can someone advise whether this is the behavior as intended or whether this points to an issue in Qt? Regards, Danny Smit ___ Intere