Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

On Friday, 14 February 2025 08:42:56 Pacific Standard Time Andy wrote: > That's great news - thanks Allan. > > I look forward to getting rid of MSVC! Please note there are other places inside Qt that only enable certain features for MSVC (search for QT_CONFIG(cpp_winrt) in the sources). I don't

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

That's great news - thanks Allan. I look forward to getting rid of MSVC! --- Andy Maloney // https://asmaloney.com mastodon ~ @asmalo...@fosstodon.org On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:20 AM Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > On Thursday 13 February 2025 16:53:05 Cen

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

On Thursday 13 February 2025 16:53:05 Central European Standard Time Andy wrote: > Vladimir: > > Thanks for the survey. There wasn't a free-form comment section at the end > of the survey, but I had a couple of notes... > > I use QWebEngine for three things for my desktop application: (1) > disp

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView User Survey

Thanks Mike. I was actually doing something similar and moved away from it in favour of (more) self-containment! :-) I did have some success at making a "litehtml widget" and could probably replace my docs using it, but I couldn't get the creation of PDFs working with it properly. I'm sure it cou