Re: [Interest] MSVC not-the-latest: are you using it? why?

2023-02-04 Thread Bob Babcock
Thiago Macieira wrote in news:5359579.29KlJPOoH8__16072.5475566991$1675548885$gmane$org@tjmaciei-m obl5: >> They are binary-compatible. You can use MSVC 2022 with DLLs that were >> built with MSVC 2019. > > Expanding a bit more: there's one build of Qt for both compilers. > Though I guess this

Re: [Interest] MSVC not-the-latest: are you using it? why?

2023-02-04 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Friday, 3 February 2023 23:23:23 PST Sze Howe Koh wrote: > On Sat, Feb 4, 2023, 07:51 Bob Babcock wrote: > > Thiago Macieira wrote in > > news:2741742.BEx9A2HvPv__44352.1315975644$1674404321$gmane$org@tjmaciei-m > > > > obl5: > > > So, are you still > > > sticking to older MSVC releases years

Re: [Interest] Interest Digest, Vol 137, Issue 4

2023-02-04 Thread Stefan Seefeld
Hi Roland, thanks for your feedback ! I partially agree with your analysis. In particular, I'm not entirely sure why the entire application logic needs to gravitate around a single event loop. For user-input events this of course makes sense, as they are naturally ordered and so conceptually we do