Re: [Interest] [Development] Qt 6.5 Is Irrelevant for More than 95% of Mac Desktops

2022-12-17 Thread coroberti
On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 3:29 AM Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Saturday, 17 December 2022 05:40:48 -03 Tuukka Turunen via Interest wrote: > > at least between versions 10.15 and 11 there does not seem to be a > > major drop in what HW is supported. > > There is a drop, but we're talking about CPUs

Re: [Interest] [Development] Qt 6.5 Is Irrelevant for More than 95% of Mac Desktops

2022-12-17 Thread coroberti
Thanks, Eike. Kind regards, Robert Iakobashvili On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 2:43 PM Eike Ziller wrote: > > "Apple are incorrectly reporting Big Sur 11 as Catalin 10.15. You can read > more about it here. > We can't correctly show usage for Big Sur 11 or Catalina 10.15 u

Re: [Interest] [Development] Qt 6.5 Is Irrelevant for More than 95% of Mac Desktops

2022-12-17 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Saturday, 17 December 2022 05:40:48 -03 Tuukka Turunen via Interest wrote: > at least between versions 10.15 and 11 there does not seem to be a > major drop in what HW is supported. There is a drop, but we're talking about CPUs launched in 2013 and older. Specifically, 11.0 drops support for

Re: [Interest] [Development] Qt 6.5 Is Irrelevant for More than 95% of Mac Desktops

2022-12-17 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Interest
Hi, Most of the macOS users are quite quick to take on new OS versions and this is true also for adoption of macOS versions with the new numbering scheme. Apple hardware is also rather good in keeping support for new OS versions and at least between versions 10.15 and 11 there does not seem to