Re: [Interest] Individual developer license is too expensive

2022-02-23 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022, Ben Cottrell wrote: > However, it would be nice to have a commercial license to be able to > use Qt static libraries in closed source software You can do that with the LGPL ones. >, and to also receive support from The Qt Company. Right, that’s a possibly deciding point. b

Re: [Interest] Individual developer license is too expensive

2022-02-23 Thread coroberti
Dear Ben, If you enter the path of a paid license, it appears that there is no path back to open-source licensing due to the structure of Qt-paid that forbids it for the same project. Therefore, don't be in a rush to pay, and check if you are really getting something for paid. Kind regards, Rober

Re: [Interest] Individual developer license is too expensive

2022-02-23 Thread Ben Cottrell
On 23/02/22 8:22 pm, Maurice Kalinowski wrote: Hey, just checking whether you are aware of the Qt for Small Business license, where you seem to be eligible for? https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.qt.io%2Fpricing%2Fqt-for-small-business&data=04%7C01%7C%7C1255