Re: [Interest] Skybox Qt Quick3D bad performance in Android

Hi Thank you for your anwser and sorry by my late replay. Using ktx files instead of hdr is alot better indeed, in my tablet, dropped the load time from 55seconds to aprox. 1 or 2 seconds wich what is expected.I guess the only downside is the file size, the 2.1MB hdr file grown up to 59MB ktx,

Re: [Interest] Compile Qt 6.2.1 from source

> My rule of thumb: 2 GB of RAM per logical processor to do a compilation. So > 16 > GB of RAM is sufficient for a 4-core system (8 CPUs), but not for 6-core (12 > > CPUs). > But this doesn't apply to qtwebengine. That thing has a few VERY big files > > that are concatenation of a lot of smal

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.15 LTS vs Qt 6.2 LTS

There are no patient killing bugs in the underlying OS or the previously used drivers. Those only exist in the new drivers, new OS patches and new Qt code. All of the new code has to be written following 62304 SDLC Although I doubt that Windows XP or the new graphics drivers are free of patien

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.15 LTS vs Qt 6.2 LTS

On 10/1/2021 10:52 AM, Ulf Hermann wrote: I doubt you get a paid-for 5.15 LTS under an Open Source licence, so no, this is not comparable a̲t̲ ̲a̲l̲l̲. I did not compare to anything. Roland listed a number of open source projects with LTS versions_after_ I wrote this. If you want to discuss t

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.15 LTS vs Qt 6.2 LTS

On 10/1/2021 5:00 AM, Ulf Hermann wrote: 1) On rare occasions patient killing bugs like this one get fixed. https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-12055 This has very little to do with "security" unless one puts application stability under the se