Long story short: You can have a Qt 5.15 LTS. You just have to pay for
it. You can even have Qt supported on obscure outdated platforms, as
Volker mentioned. It's just even more expensive. The price is high
because there is a lot work involved in making this happen and the
number of customers r
So I just used the example multimedia project in Qt Creator and added the
same line, it fails the same way.
Before I go filing a bug report though, could this be because I'm running
Big Sur in a VM? (Parallels)
This is what I've been doing to compile and run the app without that line
just fine (usi
On 9/30/21 3:44 PM, Ulf Hermann wrote:
As of last month, 1.26% of all laptops and desktop computers
worldwide were still running on the 19-year-old OS. That’s a greater
proportion than much younger operating systems Windows 8 (0.57%),
ChromeOS (0.42%) and Windows Vista (0.12%).
The only thing on
Hi,
Please file a bug with a sample project that reproduces this issue, thanks!
tor arne
On 30 Sep 2021, at 20:28, Wesley Krasko
mailto:wesbl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Thanks. So I added this to my pro file for macos:
QMAKE_APPLE_DEVICE_ARCHS="x86_64 arm64"
It looked like it was going to build
Thank you
It's equal to building Qt5, wich I did before, I thought that for Qt6 git
sources were no longer available.
CheersJoão
Em quinta-feira, 30 de setembro de 2021 19:18:03 GMT+1, Shawn Rutledge
escreveu:
On 2021 Sep 30, at 19:21, joao morgado via Interest
wrote:
Hi
I have
Thanks. So I added this to my pro file for macos:
QMAKE_APPLE_DEVICE_ARCHS="x86_64 arm64"
It looked like it was going to build fine and then I got 1 build error
for my app :(
It says:
cannot use 'c++-cpp-output' output with multiple -arch options
I searched that and fine results for "output
On 2021 Sep 30, at 19:21, joao morgado via Interest
mailto:interest@qt-project.org>> wrote:
Hi
I have a commercial Qt license, can I compile Qt 6.2.1 branch from source ?
I have reported some bugs that are now fixed in that branch, would like to try
it.
I've been searching codereview reposito
Hi
I have a commercial Qt license, can I compile Qt 6.2.1 branch from source ?I
have reported some bugs that are now fixed in that branch, would like to try it.
I've been searching codereview repositories, but I'm a bit lost.
ThanksJoão
___
Interest mail
On Thursday, 30 September 2021 06:59:17 PDT Roland Hughes via Interest wrote:
> As the very public conversations with our friend Scott have revealed,
> even Intel is running **in production** systems Qt dropped. Ironic since
> they are using it to make the very chips needed to run Qt at least in
>
> On 30 Sep 2021, at 15:59, Roland Hughes via Interest
> wrote:
> On 9/30/21 5:00 AM, interest-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 29 September 2021 07:40:11 PDT Rui Oliveira wrote:
>>
>>> "Both *Windows 7 or 8.x*
>>> version support will not be available for Qt 6"
>>>
>> https://su
As of last month, 1.26% of all laptops and desktop computers
worldwide were still running on the 19-year-old OS. That’s a greater
proportion than much younger operating systems Windows 8 (0.57%),
ChromeOS (0.42%) and Windows Vista (0.12%).
The only thing one has to do to keep these systems "secu
On 9/30/21 5:00 AM, interest-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 September 2021 07:40:11 PDT Rui Oliveira wrote:
"Both*Windows 7 or 8.x* version support will not be available for Qt 6"
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/windows-7-support-ended-on-january-14-2020-b75d4580-2
12 matches
Mail list logo
