Re: [Interest] Ashamed bug :)

On Friday, 3 September 2021 14:04:01 PDT David M. Cotter wrote: > there's also the rather daunting barrier to entry for folks who COULD fix > it: > > getting the qt sources on your local computer, getting them to compile, > getting your project to use the build libraries for testing, getting it al

Re: [Interest] Ashamed bug :)

there's also the rather daunting barrier to entry for folks who COULD fix it: getting the qt sources on your local computer, getting them to compile, getting your project to use the build libraries for testing, getting it all connected to git so you can submit changes, actually submitting change

Re: [Interest] Ashamed bug :)

On Friday, 3 September 2021 12:23:53 PDT Bernhard Lindner wrote: > > We’re all looking forward to your contribution! > > > > https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_Contribution_Guidelines > > Once upon a time finding, analyzing and reporting bugs was considered a > contribution as well. It is. But when someone

Re: [Interest] Ashamed bug :)

> We’re all looking forward to your contribution! > > https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_Contribution_Guidelines Once upon a time finding, analyzing and reporting bugs was considered a contribution as well. -- Best Regards, Bernhard Lindner ___ Interest mailing

[Interest] Replacing QListWidget that uses cell widgets with QListView & model

We've got an application we're working on where we'd like to replace a QListWidget that uses cell widgets, with a view/model/delegate and we're running into a snag. Here's what we have: We have a "layerData" class with three member variables: - bool visible - QString name - double opacity We h

Re: [Interest] Ashamed bug :)

Appreciated. For commercial license holders, contacting our support team is the right approach to get issues impacting your product flagged. Cheers, Volker > On 3 Sep 2021, at 16:54, Crocker, William wrote: > > I gave you money. > That is my contribution. > >> >> >> We’re all looking for

Re: [Interest] Ashamed bug :)

I gave you money. That is my contribution. > > > We’re all looking forward to your contribution! > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_Contribution_Guidelines__;!!A3Ni8C > S0y2Y!pfKZTNY9HoSsx4ICysjigHnt8T5UfDgm7vz9vF_zbwiTUAOveu1JUyFyM- > FVnCwjs0-A$ > > Cheers, > Volker > >

Re: [Interest] Save / load file contents on android

Am 03.09.21 um 16:08 schrieb Nuno Santos: So, if the application data is sandboxed, how do we migrate data that used to be in shared locations to the sandbox? I was using the Documents location to keeps users presets, but now I will need to migrate those files to inside the app From your exp

Re: [Interest] Save / load file contents on android

So, if the application data is sandboxed, how do we migrate data that used to be in shared locations to the sandbox? I was using the Documents location to keeps users presets, but now I will need to migrate those files to inside the app From your experience what is the most appropriated QStand

Re: [Interest] Save / load file contents on android

Am 03.09.21 um 14:51 schrieb Jérôme Godbout: Take care with the eternal storage opt out will no more be possible after November. We will need to target SDK 12 to publish to the store. So the 11 opt out flag will no more be possible (November for existing application, for new application it’s

Re: [Interest] Save / load file contents on android

But doesn’t QStandardPath resolve to different locations depending if legacyExternalStorage is enabled or not? > On 3 Sep 2021, at 13:51, Jérôme Godbout wrote: > > Take care with the eternal storage opt out will no more be possible after > November. We will need to target SDK 12 to publish to

Re: [Interest] Provide a Means to Make Static Builds of Qt 6.1 for Android, macOS, Windows and GNU/Linux

> However, configuring and building Qt on Microsoft Windows on a Windows > host with either MinGW or MSVC has been impossible. I did it in the past and it is doable. However, I must also say that Windows is not my preferred platform for development. So for years I'm now conducting my Windows bui

Re: [Interest] Qt 6.2 vs. Qt 5.15 – The Feature Parity Comparison – QtPDF

Hi, On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 09:52:04AM +0200, Heiko Gerdau wrote: > Our main usecase is the quick display of stored external (and selfmade) > PDF-documents without the need to start an external application. Is that so > uncommon? FWIW if simple displaying of PDFs is all you need, you can also use

Re: [Interest] Ashamed bug :)

> On 3 Sep 2021, at 14:06, Alexander Dyagilev wrote: > > Hello :) > > I think this bug is easy to fix, but yet, it's still theme for almost of 5 > years! > > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-58335 > > One just forgot to use encodeURIComponent/decodeURIComponent in proper > places... >

[Interest] Ashamed bug :)

Hello :) I think this bug is easy to fix, but yet, it's still theme for almost of 5 years! https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-58335 One just forgot to use encodeURIComponent/decodeURIComponent in proper places... I think this is a must to fix bug for upcoming Qt 6.2 :)

Re: [Interest] Provide a Means to Make Static Builds of Qt 6.1 for Android, macOS, Windows and GNU/Linux

Hi, Coin CI mostly just calls CMake with the configuration options specified at the link below (there are some additional configuration in other sibling files) https://github.com/qt/qt5/blob/dev/coin/platform_configs/cmake_platforms.yaml The ones that are building Qt as static libraries have -D

Re: [Interest] Qt 6.2 vs. Qt 5.15 – The Feature Parity Comparison – QtPDF

On Freitag, 3. September 2021 09:52:04 CEST Heiko Gerdau wrote: > Am 02.09.21 um 15:14 schrieb Benjamin TERRIER: > > Hi > > > > I just went through the latest news article: > > https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-6.2-vs.-qt-5.15-the-feature-parity-comparison > >

Re: [Interest] Qt 6.2 vs. Qt 5.15 – The Feature Parity Comparison – QtPDF

Hey, > -Original Message- > From: Interest On Behalf Of Heiko > Gerdau > Sent: Freitag, 3. September 2021 09:52 > To: interest@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Interest] Qt 6.2 vs. Qt 5.15 – The Feature Parity Comparison – > QtPDF > > > Am 02.09.21 um 15:14 schrieb Benjamin TERRIER: > >

[Interest] Provide a Means to Make Static Builds of Qt 6.1 for Android, macOS, Windows and GNU/Linux

I've tried to configure and build Qt 6.1 statically, and have succeeded doing so on GNU/Linux, specifically Debian 11. However, configuring and building Qt on Microsoft Windows on a Windows host with either MinGW or MSVC has been impossible. I would like to have virtual machines or Docker contain

Re: [Interest] Save / load file contents on android

Hi Nuno, Am 03.09.21 um 11:05 schrieb Nuno Santos: Ekke, I have been experiencing some inconsistencies with Android file access using QStandardPaths, mostly now that I’m preparing the ground for Android 11 support. From Android 11 onwards, there will be changes in the way an app can access f

Re: [Interest] Save / load file contents on android

Ekke, I have been experiencing some inconsistencies with Android file access using QStandardPaths, mostly now that I’m preparing the ground for Android 11 support. From Android 11 onwards, there will be changes in the way an app can access filesystem resources. This problem started when one of

Re: [Interest] Qt 6.2 vs. Qt 5.15 – The Feature Parity Comparison – QtPDF

Am 02.09.21 um 15:14 schrieb Benjamin TERRIER: Hi I just went through the latest news article: https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-6.2-vs.-qt-5.15-the-feature-parity-comparison And the linked feature comparison table: https://