On 2021-08-30 21:43, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Monday, 30 August 2021 12:23:54 PDT Henry Skoglund wrote:
Thanks Thiago for the clarification re. those "-skip xxx" options. I
guess I can skip them :-)
Ok, one benefit remains: saving some time when compiling/building the
static Qt version.
Indeed
On Monday, 30 August 2021 12:23:54 PDT Henry Skoglund wrote:
> Thanks Thiago for the clarification re. those "-skip xxx" options. I
> guess I can skip them :-)
> Ok, one benefit remains: saving some time when compiling/building the
> static Qt version.
Indeed. But you could save time by just downl
On 2021-08-30 20:48, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Monday, 30 August 2021 10:32:03 PDT Henry Skoglund wrote:
configure that has a "-skip " for all
modules expect qtbase.
That makes zero difference in your final binary.
If you need a library that wasn't compiled, your application will fail to
l
On Monday, 30 August 2021 10:32:03 PDT Henry Skoglund wrote:
> configure that has a "-skip " for all
> modules expect qtbase.
That makes zero difference in your final binary.
If you need a library that wasn't compiled, your application will fail to
link. If you have a library that your appli
On 2021-08-30 18:15, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Monday, 30 August 2021 04:04:42 PDT Joerg Bornemann wrote:
Use configure -list-features and pick something you definitely don't
need, for example
lcdnumber Widgets: Provides LCD-like digits.
and configure and build Qt with -no-featu
I have an app heavily dependent on Multimedia.
it took me about a week and a half total
i created a header "Qt6Bridge.h" that defines a bunch of stuff one way or
another depending on qt5 or qt6 (have to keep qt5 build alive until Qt6 has all
the functionality in need).
eg:
#ifndef _H_Qt6Bridg
Thiago,
Thanks for the clarification.
I was convinced that qmake was not available anymore. My bad! :/
Still, I think 10 days of evaluation is a really short period of time.
I would love to hear feedback from people who have started porting their
software to Qt 6 and how the effort of such mig
On Monday, 30 August 2021 04:22:52 PDT Nuno Santos wrote:
> I would say that taking into account the fact that Qt has a new building
> system and qmake is not available anymore, porting an existing project
> takes much more than 10 days.
That's incorrect. qmake is still available.
--
Thiago Maci
On Monday, 30 August 2021 04:04:42 PDT Joerg Bornemann wrote:
> Use configure -list-features and pick something you definitely don't
> need, for example
> lcdnumber Widgets: Provides LCD-like digits.
> and configure and build Qt with -no-feature-lcdnumber
That's probably not a goo
Am 30. August 2021 11:22:52 UTC schrieb Nuno Santos :
>Hi,
>
>What do you do with a 10 days evaluation of Qt 6?
>
>I would say that taking into account the fact that Qt has a new building
>system and qmake is not available anymore, porting an existing project takes
>much more than 10 days.
>
>Any
Hi,
What do you do with a 10 days evaluation of Qt 6?
I would say that taking into account the fact that Qt has a new building system
and qmake is not available anymore, porting an existing project takes much more
than 10 days.
Any feedback from users that have already tried Qt 6 and are porti
On 8/28/21 3:02 AM, Ben Cottrell wrote:
Yes, I've tried configure with these command line arguments:
./configure -opensource -confirm-license -platform linux-g++ -prefix
/opt/6.1.2-linux-g++-static -static
However, you did not disable any of Qt's features, like Thiago suggested.
Use co
On 8/28/2021 3:02 AM, Ben Cottrell wrote:
Yes, I've tried configure with these command line arguments:
./configure -opensource -confirm-license -platform linux-g++ -prefix
/opt/6.1.2-linux-g++-static -static
I got lots of errors after running configure, about missing XCB
libraries, so fo
13 matches
Mail list logo
