Hi,
We migrated to Qt 5.15 LTS with eglfs as platform plugin.
In our existing network, two nodes(processor cards) are connected through
serial RS 485 and corresponding remote displays(one main display and the
other secondary remote display) are to be rendered graphics and handle
touch events.
In
Hi again,
Thanks for clarifying! Now I see what goes wrong in my calculations.
If possible, please submit a new bug to bugreports.qt.io as Mitch suggests,
adding the example and the measurements.
(And also feel free to post the bug link here, so Mitch or I could add more
info, etc. if something
Hello,
I used the delta value by subtraction, as there is a base memory usage cost by
qtcore/qtgui/QWindow...
so the ratio should be (material usage - base) / (normal usage - base), the
memory usage increases almost LINERLY
And, when the count is very big, the memory usage of material style is
Hello,
I don't understand how you got the 70 times difference (how is average per 200
buttons computed? and why 200?)
According to the data:
button count
normal (MB)
material (MB)
ratio*:
material / normal
100
24.2
130
5.37
300
27.7
343
12.38
500
30.9
555
17.96
*rounded values
The trend doesn'
Hi.
> -Original Message-
> From: Interest On Behalf Of nus1998
> Sent: Tuesday, 11 May 2021 3:11 AM
> To: interest@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Interest] Material controls memory usage
>
> Hi All,
>
> I made a simple comparison that it looks material controls cost 70 times
> memory as no
If its just virtual memory, it looks about right to me. Try Universal style, it
should lie in-between.
--
Frank
On 11.05.21 03:10, nus1998 wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I made a simple comparison that it looks material controls cost 70 times
> memory as normal quick controls, is it expected?
>
> my OS
