Re: [Interest] QML Singleton and QTimer?

Hi, Is your QTimer access before the QGuiApplication is created (static singleton)? That could explain why this complain and moving the singleton instance into the GuiApplcation constructor solve your problems. What we do over here, I have a custom template method that register the singleton fr

Re: [Interest] QML Singleton and QTimer?

Well, the documentation gives the example of the singleton being instantiated at the main.cpp:main() level.   It felt a little wrong, but I subclassed QGuiApplication, and created and registered the singleton there: GuiApplication::GuiApplication(int argc, char*argv[]): QGuiApplication::QGuiAp

Re: [Interest] QClipboard - wasm

Hi, That does sound like a bug. You should report it on https://bugreports.qt.io/ with a minimal example if you haven’t already. On 7 May 2021, at 02:21, Nicholas Yue mailto:yue.nicho...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi, I have build a Qt app on Ubuntu which I am able to set the clipboard text q

Re: [Interest] [Development] Mac Big Sur - Qt Open-Source Support For

For our application we grabbed the Qt 5.15 build script that Kitware used for universal binary CMake and used that to build Qt 5.15.2 on our M1 mac and have been using that for some beta testers. So far no one has complained about M1 specific issues. We also did *NOT* build all of Qt5, just the

Re: [Interest] [Development] Mac Big Sur - Qt Open-Source Support For

I see! Thanks for your reply. Best > On 7 May 2021, at 12:32, Tuukka Turunen wrote: > > > Hi, > > By “rough edges”, I was referring to no pre-built binaries and functionality > not tested so there can be issues even though a lot of things will probably > work just fine (Qt in general has

Re: [Interest] [Development] Mac Big Sur - Qt Open-Source Support For

Hi, By “rough edges”, I was referring to no pre-built binaries and functionality not tested so there can be issues even though a lot of things will probably work just fine (Qt in general has been supporting ARM since ages). Yours, Tuukka From: Interest on behalf of Nuno Sant

Re: [Interest] [Development] Mac Big Sur - Qt Open-Source Support For

> On 7 May 2021, at 12:28, coroberti wrote: > > Dear Tor Arne, > Thank you for your reply. > It's less useful since Qt-6 is a phantom, beta, and it will remain so > for a year or more. A wise person once said: > I'd appreciate not to hijack this question for any discussions beyond the > very n

Re: [Interest] [Development] Mac Big Sur - Qt Open-Source Support For

Thanks for your reply. Can you please be more specific about the “rough edges”? I know people that have been able to compile Qt 5.15 from the source with M1 and so far so good. Thanks! Regards, Nuno > On 7 May 2021, at 11:16, Tuukka Turunen wrote: > > Hi, > > Supporting Apple silicon is

Re: [Interest] [Development] Mac Big Sur - Qt Open-Source Support For

Thanks, Tuukka, for the information. Kind regards, Robert Iakobashvili On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 1:18 PM Tuukka Turunen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Supporting Apple silicon is something we are actively working to have in > place for Qt 6.2 including full CI coverage etc. >

Re: [Interest] [Development] Mac Big Sur - Qt Open-Source Support For

Dear Tor Arne, Thank you for your reply. It's less useful since Qt-6 is a phantom, beta, and it will remain so for a year or more. Kind regards, Robert Iakobashvili On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:47 PM Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: > > Qt 6.0 and above has official support for B

Re: [Interest] [Development] Mac Big Sur - Qt Open-Source Support For

Dear Eike, Thanks for your comprehensive answer. I will try to build it from open-source 5.15 branch Where is the link to the branch? Thanks! Kind regards, Robert Iakobashvili On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 1:12 PM Eike Ziller wrote: > > > > > On May 7, 2021, at 11:47, Tor

Re: [Interest] [Development] Mac Big Sur - Qt Open-Source Support For

Hi, Supporting Apple silicon is something we are actively working to have in place for Qt 6.2 including full CI coverage etc. To some extent things will work also with Qt 5.15 if you build yourself, but there are some rough edges (and Qt 5.15 is not tested for M1). Yours, Tuuk

Re: [Interest] [Development] Mac Big Sur - Qt Open-Source Support For

Tor, What about building Qt 5.15.X for M1 Macs? Is there any kind of wiki resource out there? Regards, Nuno > On 7 May 2021, at 10:47, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: > > Qt 6.0 and above has official support for Big Sur: > > https://doc.qt.io/archives/qt-6.0/macos.html >

Re: [Interest] [Development] Mac Big Sur - Qt Open-Source Support For

Qt 6.0 and above has official support for Big Sur: https://doc.qt.io/archives/qt-6.0/macos.html 5.15 is not yet officially supported, but should work fine as well, so please report any issues in JIRA, thanks! Cheers, Tor Arne On 7 May 2021, at 11:00, coroberti mailto:corobe...@gmail.com>> wro

[Interest] Mac Big Sur - Qt Open-Source Support For

Dear Tukka and others, Since September Big Sur is a reality. Which Qt-version supports correctly QWidgets for this platform for open-source development. If there's no such version, when the support is planned if ever. I'd appreciate not to hijack this question for any discussions beyond the very