On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 at 07:39, Bernhard Lindner
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Can someone tell me why QCoreApplication uses an 'int &argc' type parameter
> instead of a
> plain 'int argc'? Does QCoreApplication expect the value to change? Does it
> change the
> value by itself?
>
> When deriving from QCoreAp
Spam detection software, running on the system "mx.qt-project.org",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
C
Hi!
Can someone tell me why QCoreApplication uses an 'int &argc' type parameter
instead of a
plain 'int argc'? Does QCoreApplication expect the value to change? Does it
change the
value by itself?
When deriving from QCoreApplication this can cause funny crashes if one forgets
to use a
referenc
At Thu, 7 Jan 2021 12:01:58 -0800 Yuvraaj Kelkar wrote:
>
> I hope what Robert meant was that if you want someone to fix bugs for you on
> an old LTS, then you have to pay for the support.
> Because that would make a LOT of sense.
Yes. I expect that the license QT is under is NOT the GNU lice
I hope what Robert meant was that if you want someone to fix bugs for you on an
old LTS, then you have to pay for the support.
Because that would make a LOT of sense.
Thanks,
-Uv
On Jan 7 2021, at 11:12 am, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2021, Robert Heller wrote:
>
> > No, 5.15 is stil
On Thu, 7 Jan 2021, Robert Heller wrote:
> No, 5.15 is still open source. It is just that if you want to keep using that
> version *AND* want updates, you will have to pay *for the updates*,
How would that work?
Either the updates are also Open Source, in which cases nobody could
prevent the fi
At Thu, 7 Jan 2021 15:25:53 + Jérôme Godbout
wrote:
>
> From what I understand, opens source are only latest version, so > 5.15.2
> will be only for commercial since 6.0 is out. So they only support open
> source for the latest release. But the trouble here is that 6.0 is not fully
Le jeu. 7 janv. 2021 à 18:30, Benjamin TERRIER a
écrit :
>
> So basically for open source users the support of Qt 5.15 has stopped 9
> months before a usable version should be available.
>
Totally agree, but that point has already been made in the dev mailing list.
So we can assume that Tuuka is
On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 16:38, Tuukka Turunen wrote:
>
>
> In essence the situation for open-source users is just like it was for
> everyone before introducing the long-term supported releases (with Qt 5.6).
>
>
No, it is not.
The issue of open source users is not that LTS are commercial only (wel
I was pretty clear to me at least, I just think that rules should not carry
between major version (from 5 to 6) but only between minor version. As it make
not much sense, feature are not fully portable, yeah people should update one
day, but it's not as simple as upgrading from a minor version.
Looking at how my text art came through the mailing list service, there is too
much overlap. I tried to “draw” this so that next one begins around the time
previous ends, but did not fully succeed. I hope the main point was still
successfully conveyed.
Yours,
Tuukka
From: Inte
Hi Michael,
All Qt feature releases are available for all users of Qt. It is just the
extended period of long-term support that is available for commercial license
holders only.
One way to visualize period of available patch releases for open-source users
is as follows:
Qt 5.13 *
Qt
From what I understand, opens source are only latest version, so > 5.15.2 will
be only for commercial since 6.0 is out. So they only support open source for
the latest release. But the trouble here is that 6.0 is not fully completed
yet, which make it kind of trouble some.
So for what I underst
Dear Tuukka,
As an open source developer who has used Qt since 2009, I am still a bit
confused as to what versions of Qt6 that my open-source project should be using
over time? For example, we might be lucky enough to port to the 6.0 release,
and then to 6.1. If 6.2 is LTS and commercial o
Hi,
That leave a sour taste since 6.0 is far to be ready for mainstream, don't get
me wrong it is a great rework and show many potential. But I cannot even port a
single project to it so far (none of the project I work on have all the
necessary module, IoT application without oauth or bluetooth
Thanks for your mail.
Sorry got the version wrong. Meant to upgrade from the existing version
of 2.52.3 to version higher than 2.60.4 and above.
Also in the plan to upgrade to latest Qt 6 though we are yet to decide to
move from the existing qtwebkit module to Qtwebengine.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 5
On Thursday, 7 January 2021 03:15:41 -03 Ramakanth Kesireddy wrote:
> A vulnerability is found with the glib version 2.52.3 as
> https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-12450.
>
> Is it recommended to upgrade the glib version to 2.8.3 or look for any
> patch with the existing version or ignore t
On Thursday, 7 January 2021 07:26:33 -03 Richard Weickelt wrote:
> It was ONLY communicated that releases will no longer be available. It was
> NOT communicated that the LTS branches will be closed for new commits and
> further patches land in a different repository.
It was. Maybe not in that same
> Apologies for not sending the mail also to the interest mailing list. This
> is nothing new, as this was announced in already February 2020.
Please correct me if I am wrong. I assume that you are referring to this
blog post: https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-offering-changes-2020
It was ONLY communica
Hi,
Apologies for not sending the mail also to the interest mailing list. This is
nothing new, as this was announced in already February 2020. Otherwise Qt
continues to be available for open-source users, but the long-term support
releases of Qt will be available only for the commercial license
Hi Giuseppe,
On Thu, 7 Jan 2021, 21:42 Giuseppe D'Angelo via Interest, <
interest@qt-project.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Il 07/01/21 04:03, Jérôme Godbout ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> > is this any true?
> >
> https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Qt-5.15-LTS-Commercial-Phase
>
> Please see the
Hi,
Il 07/01/21 04:03, Jérôme Godbout ha scritto:
Hi,
is this any true?
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Qt-5.15-LTS-Commercial-Phase
Please see the thread on development@ (no idea why the original message
was not posted on interest@ as well.).
https://lists.qt-project.o
22 matches
Mail list logo
