On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 09:50:27 PDT Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
> Carbon is an umbrella framework for these frameworks:
Ah,. "umbrella framework". That explains. the actual binary file called
"Carbon" is way too small (just 22k) to have anything useful inside.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieir
On 24 Jun 2020, at 18:50, Tor Arne Vestbø
mailto:tor.arne.ves...@qt.io>> wrote:
Actually, Carbon is still around, and 64-bit:
❯ otool -h /System/Library/Frameworks/Carbon.framework/Carbon
Mach header
magic cputype cpusubtype capsfiletype ncmds sizeofcmds flags
0xfeedfacf 1677
On 24 Jun 2020, at 18:28, Thiago Macieira
mailto:thiago.macie...@intel.com>> wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 08:50:17 PDT David M. Cotter wrote:
Apple ... said that they are still supporting carbon ... on the ARM based
Macs
wait what?
reference please?
https://developer.apple.com/documentati
On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 08:50:17 PDT David M. Cotter wrote:
> > Apple ... said that they are still supporting carbon ... on the ARM based
> > Macs
> wait what?
>
> reference please?
>
> carbon is 32bit. 32bit is dead on Catalina, right? and Big Sur is
> post-catalina. so... have i missed some
At the point where Apple almost released 64-bit Carbon, but reversed course and
made us all switch to writing things with funny square brackets instead, Carbon
had been largely ported to 64 bits. There is still quite a bit of Carbon under
the hood in Cocoa.
-John Weeks
WaveMetrics, Inc.
> On J
> Apple ... said that they are still supporting carbon ... on the ARM based Macs
wait what?
reference please?
carbon is 32bit. 32bit is dead on Catalina, right? and Big Sur is
post-catalina. so... have i missed something?___
Interest mailing list
Int
Hello Thiago,
Thanks a lot for your quick response. We shall use backend instead of using
wayland compositor.
In one of the programs where we are using Qt 5.6.3 widgets based on kernel
4.14, the DRM driver replaces the fbdev driver on TI AM335x.
As mentioned in https://doc.qt.io/archives/qt-5.6/
Hi,
We’ll certainly support Big Sur, but the amount of work we need to do there to
make things work 100% is yet unknown as well, especially as Apple has made
rather large changes to their look and feel.
Regarding macOS/ARM I don’t see a huge problem for Qt. Short term, Rosetta2
should have us
me2
Kind regards,
Robert
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 2:21 PM Marc Britton wrote:
>
> I too would like to know about the Qt Company's reactions/plans for this.
>
> Cheers
> --
> Marc
>
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 17:57, Pascal Henze wrote:
>>
>> With the announcement from Apple to move from Intel to AR
I too would like to know about the Qt Company's reactions/plans for this.
Cheers
--
Marc
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 17:57, Pascal Henze wrote:
> With the announcement from Apple to move from Intel to ARM what are the
> impacts for QT ?
> Will there be another "Kit" for macOS to build an arm version
With the announcement from Apple to move from Intel to ARM what are the impacts
for QT ?
Will there be another "Kit" for macOS to build an arm version or is it already
possible at the moment?
Does anyone have information about that?
Thank you.
___
In
11 matches
Mail list logo
