On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 1:32 PM coroberti . wrote:
> Trying to allow Drag to my app on iOS (iPad with spitted view)
> and working in line with: https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/dnd.html
>
> I see that dragEnterEvent () and dragMoveEvent () are never called.
>
> This is in contrast to Mac OS X where it works
Spam detection software, running on the system "mx.qt-project.org",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
C
> On 19 Apr 2020, at 01:16, Thorsten Hofer-Schmitz
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to handle the input of a stylus on a tablet. Qt has an example on
> how to do this using a QWidget-based application. I tested it on my tablet
> and everything works fine.
>
> I would like to do this in QML/Q
On Sunday, 19 April 2020 00:59:25 -03 Nyall Dawson wrote:
> Just to clarify -- are you saying it's been deprecated IN qt 6, or
> removed in qt 6?
Deprecated in 5.15. It's not been removed in Qt 6 yet but it might be.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Inte
On Sunday, 19 April 2020 08:05:05 -03 André Pönitz wrote:
> > We can't do that right now because we can't rely on C++20. In fact, no
> > current compiler supports the spaceship operator. So that has to be Qt 7.
>
> How comes the spaceship operator comes into play here?
>
> It's syntactical sugar
On Sunday, 19 April 2020 09:39:40 -03 André Pönitz wrote:
> > What about non-integral types?
>
> They are compared by typeName(). So any QChar would be less-than any
> QRegularExpression.
We can order by type, but I don't think we should. But that's a choice.
As Allan said, QVariant to QVariant
On Sonntag, 19. April 2020 14:39:40 CEST André Pönitz wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 02:21:39PM +0200, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > > I don't think we need "incomparable" here.
> > >
> > > QVariant(TypeA) and QVariant(TypeB) can be ordered for different TypeA
> > > and
> > > TypeB based e.g.
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 02:21:39PM +0200, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > I don't think we need "incomparable" here.
> >
> > QVariant(TypeA) and QVariant(TypeB) can be ordered for different TypeA and
> > TypeB based e.g. on alphabetical order of their .typeName().
> >
> > If wanted, this can be
On Sonntag, 19. April 2020 14:23:56 CEST André Pönitz wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 01:28:32PM +0200, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > On Sonntag, 19. April 2020 13:05:05 CEST André Pönitz wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 09:44:40PM -0300, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > > On Saturday, 18 April
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 01:28:32PM +0200, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> On Sonntag, 19. April 2020 13:05:05 CEST André Pönitz wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 09:44:40PM -0300, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > On Saturday, 18 April 2020 12:57:55 -03 Giuseppe D'Angelo via Interest
> wrote:
> > > > I
On Sonntag, 19. April 2020 13:05:05 CEST André Pönitz wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 09:44:40PM -0300, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Saturday, 18 April 2020 12:57:55 -03 Giuseppe D'Angelo via Interest
wrote:
> > > I guess that's the reason for dropping the comparisons in 6.0 and,
> > > eventuall
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 09:44:40PM -0300, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Saturday, 18 April 2020 12:57:55 -03 Giuseppe D'Angelo via Interest wrote:
> > I guess that's the reason for dropping the comparisons in 6.0 and,
> > eventually, reintroduce it in 7.0. With the hope that we've learned the
> > les
12 matches
Mail list logo
