Il 01/11/19 17:42, Jason H ha scritto:
I am using signals/slots in QML and the signal emissions are getting inverted.
Here's my example:
bool Socket::emitSignalForOp(const QByteArray &) "STF10" 10
bool Socket::emitSignalForOp(const QByteArray &) "PSF09" 11
STF10 necessarily comes after PSF09. I
I am using signals/slots in QML and the signal emissions are getting inverted.
Here's my example:
bool Socket::emitSignalForOp(const QByteArray &) "STF10" 10
bool Socket::emitSignalForOp(const QByteArray &) "PSF09" 11
STF10 necessarily comes after PSF09. In wall-clock time it does. But Qt is not
Oh, good call. I got it confused with QNetworkReply's finished();
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 at 8:16 PM
From: "Tony Rietwyk"
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Curious QNetworkAccessManager behavior.
Hi Jason,
You should only connect to QNetworkAccessManager::fin
There are a few articles online about improving its performance that should
also apply to Qt. I just picked the first three I found:
-
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Canvas_API/Tutorial/Optimizing_canvas
- https://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/canvas/performance/
-
https://