Re: [Interest] [Development] Qt 6 Planning: Consideration of dropping support for UWP applications

2019-04-22 Thread Oliver Wolff
On 21/04/2019 10:43, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > On Donnerstag, 18. April 2019 14:46:59 CEST Oliver Wolff wrote: >> Hi, >> >> as you might have heard, we are currently in Qt 6's planning phase and >> thus checking things that have to be done to make Qt even better. >> Of course we also want to

Re: [Interest] [Development] Qt 6 Planning: Consideration of dropping support for UWP applications

2019-04-22 Thread Pier Luigi Fiorini
Il giorno gio 18 apr 2019 alle ore 15:36 Boudewijn Rempt via Interest < interest@qt-project.org> ha scritto: > On donderdag 18 april 2019 15:29:33 CEST Pier Luigi Fiorini wrote: > > > Does this affect shipping Qt apps in the store? > > > I'm not a Windows expert but as far as I remember only UWP a

Re: [Interest] remoteobject returning a list of remoteobjects

2019-04-22 Thread Marc Van Daele
Thanks for your reply! Let's see if I understood your correctly (and some additional questions) - If I don't need signals and slots on my Person class, I should use a POD. PROP(QList persons) will be supported but whenever something changes in the list or any property of any item in it,

Re: [Interest] remoteobject returning a list of remoteobjects

2019-04-22 Thread Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.)
Hi Marc, On 4/20/19, 6:46 AM, "Interest on behalf of Marc Van Daele" wrote: Hello, I'm trying to understand the remoteobjects component. Suppose I have, on my backend, a Household containing a list of Persons. The intent is for Qt Remote Objects to allow what Qt allows, w