Re: [Interest] moc: undefined interface - only on macOS?

2019-02-05 Thread Matthew Woehlke
On 01/02/2019 16.07, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > I am trying to build https://github.com/kitware/qtextensions. It builds > fine on Windows and Linux, but on macOS, I get strange errors (from moc) > when trying to build the designer extensions: > [snipped] > > Anyone have any idea why this would not w

Re: [Interest] clang-tidy version in Qt Creator

2019-02-05 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
That's for running the checks live in the code model. For a static analysis run (when selecting "Clang-Tidy and Clazy..." in the "Analyze" menu) performance is not important, and it should be possible to use the system install clang tools there. On 05/02/2019 19:25, Dmitriy Purgin wrote: Well

Re: [Interest] clang-tidy version in Qt Creator

2019-02-05 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
El martes, 5 de febrero de 2019 14:25:31 -03 Dmitriy Purgin escribió: > Well, try turning on more clang-tidy and clazy checks than the default > shipment of Qt Creator has! ;-) With a project of a decent size your PC's > fans will be blowing all the time like mining is still a thing! [snip] > > Si

Re: [Interest] clang-tidy version in Qt Creator

2019-02-05 Thread Dmitriy Purgin
Well, try turning on more clang-tidy and clazy checks than the default shipment of Qt Creator has! ;-) With a project of a decent size your PC's fans will be blowing all the time like mining is still a thing! Cheers On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 1:04 PM Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 05/02/2019 09:34,

Re: [Interest] Individual static analysis warning suppression in Qt Creator

2019-02-05 Thread André Pönitz
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:55:12AM +0100, Bernhard Lindner wrote: > Hi! > > > This is https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTCREATORBUG-20201 > > Again, thanks a lot for your help! > > Such a significant defect... still it isn't even evaluated :-( Not every field in JIRA is actively used. Andre' _

Re: [Interest] clang-tidy version in Qt Creator

2019-02-05 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 05/02/2019 09:34, Nikolai Kosjar wrote: On 2/4/19 10:18 PM, Bernhard Lindner wrote: Is there a way to switch/select the clang-tidy version used by Qt Creator for static code analysis on Linux? No as Qt Creator can only use the shipped/customized clang binary for this. While this come with

[Interest] About CMAKE_MKSPEC, the spec file recorded in Qt5CoreConfigExtrasMkspecDir.cmake and "using any compiler"

2019-02-05 Thread René J . V . Bertin
Hi, I just noticed something strange in the huge compiler commandlines you tend to get while building KDE applications. An application configured to build with clang adds qt5/mkspecs/linux-g++-64 to the header include path (with -isystem, at that). At first I thought this was an error in that

Re: [Interest] Individual static analysis warning suppression in Qt Creator

2019-02-05 Thread Bernhard Lindner
Hi! > This is https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTCREATORBUG-20201 Again, thanks a lot for your help! Such a significant defect... still it isn't even evaluated :-( -- Best Regards, Bernhard Lindner ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org h

Re: [Interest] clang-tidy version in Qt Creator

2019-02-05 Thread Bernhard Lindner
Hi! > > Is there a way to switch/select the clang-tidy version used by Qt Creator > > for static > > code > > analysis on Linux? > > No as Qt Creator can only use the shipped/customized clang binary for > this. While this come with some advantages (performance in case tidy and > clazy checks a