Not sure if it helps the discussion, but taking a quick look at
AssimpImporter::assimpSupportedFormats() in
qt3d/src/plugins/sceneparsers/assimp/assimpimporter.cpp, "blend" is in fact
listed as a supported format (along with 52 other formats).
Wasn't Sean loading them in some of his examples where
>From what I was informed, Blender is not supported via Assimp, although Assimp
>indicates it as a supported format, but Qt 3D is not able to load it. Is this
>incorrect? Is Qt 3D able to load a Blender file via Assimp into QSceneLoader?
Andy
Fra: Interest på
It's probably easier to post this kind of questions in the forum:
https://forum.qt.io
The answer is that you have to reimplement QStyledItemDelegate::paint but it's
unclear from your question how you store the image in the model
Luca Beldi
-Original Message-
From: hizoka [mailto:h...@f
hi Laszlo,
thanx for the prompt reply, here the bug filed:
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-67160
i'll continue my investigation too, let's hope to sort out something.
i'm wondering if there's a reason why the "widgets" are less used in
multi-screen setups. i supposed they were "first c
Hi,
No immediate ideas unfortunately, but it could well be that widgets (raster
windows) do not behave as well in this regard as pure OpenGL windows (Qt Quick
and friends). The multi-head work in the past was focused on the latter.
Please create a bug report at https://bugreports.qt.io
Best re
hello,
i put together a small code snippet for QtCreator, to better showcase
the issue i see in my dual-head setup with a Qt widget app running
through EGLFS on a libMali.so/DRM/KMS setup on Allwinner A20 mainline
based OS:
https://github.com/aventuri/widgetMultiScreen
the outcome is the w
On Monday March 19 2018 10:02:22 Kai Koehne wrote:
>Anyhow, keeping a stable API has not been a goal of Chromium so far; The
>idea seems to be that they want to develop Chrome and therefore Chromium
>freely, without the restrictions of long term API commitment.
That wouldn't surprise me, and t
> -Original Message-
> From: Interest [mailto:interest-bounces+kai.koehne=qt...@qt-project.org] On
> Behalf Of René J. V. Bertin
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 9:14 PM
> To: interest@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Interest] About Qt and WebEngine/Chromium
>
> Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> >
Another potential reason why some sort of unembedding might be interesting:
https://servo.org .
I read somewhere that one of the goals of that project is to become a drop-in
replacement for Chromium. If the current benchmarking results (*) are any
indication, this new framework could be a lot f
