My mistake: I'm not on OnDemand render policy.
On 18.01.2018 10:04, david crémoux wrote:
Hello,
While using Qt3D I'm trying to separate as much as possible the scene,
rendering, and render window/widget. I'm not using Qt3DWindow, I'm using
my own widget/surface.
The thing is, when I'm delet
Hello,
While using Qt3D I'm trying to separate as much as possible the scene,
rendering, and render window/widget. I'm not using Qt3DWindow, I'm using
my own widget/surface.
The thing is, when I'm deleting my widget, I'm not deleting everything
like in Qt3DWindow (scene, rendering, aspect, e
I propose the following motion:
directly import the whole of github & sourceforge into the Qt project.
After all why shouldn't every piece of code in the universe be part of Qt,
released at a perfect six-month cadence ?
This way, every project in the world will be able to access the "private"
Qt A
On Wednesday, 17 January 2018 10:27:43 PST Uwe Rathmann wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:34:54 -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > It is just sharing code. The important difference is that both modules
> > are developed at the same time and released at the same time, by the
> > same team.
>
> Yes of
17.01.2018, 21:30, "Uwe Rathmann" :
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:34:54 -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
>> It is just sharing code. The important difference is that both modules
>> are developed at the same time and released at the same time, by the
>> same team.
>
> Yes of course, but my project i
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:34:54 -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> It is just sharing code. The important difference is that both modules
> are developed at the same time and released at the same time, by the
> same team.
Yes of course, but my project is developed at a different time, released
at a di
On Wednesday, 17 January 2018 03:24:26 PST Uwe Rathmann wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 23:19:57 +1300, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> > Why do you need private headers in the first place?
>
> For the same reason, why a module like QuickControls 2 is using private
> headers of Quick Core.
It is just s
17.01.2018, 16:12, "Richard Moore" :
> On 11 January 2018 at 18:41, Tom Isaacson wrote:
>> But is it a performance issue, a potential threading problem, what?
>>
>> We have a large codebase and this practice hasn't been followed, I'm
>> wondering what the potential impact is and whether it's wo
On 11 January 2018 at 18:41, Tom Isaacson wrote:
> But is it a performance issue, a potential threading problem, what?
>
> We have a large codebase and this practice hasn't been followed, I'm
> wondering what the potential impact is and whether it's worth fixing.
>
A few of the reasons:
Using a
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 23:19:57 +1300, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> Why do you need private headers in the first place?
For the same reason, why a module like QuickControls 2 is using private
headers of Quick Core.
The qskinny project is about creating a C++ framework ( QML is only
optional ) wi
On 17 January 2018 at 21:32, Uwe Rathmann wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 08:25:35 +, Mitch Curtis wrote:
>
> This how I do it ( see https://github.com/uwerat/qskinny ):
>
> QT += quick quick-private
> CONFIG += no_private_qt_headers_warning
>
> To get rid of warnings from Qt headers, when doing
Hi,
I use attributes, like positionAttributes (for the vertices) and
normalAttributes (for the normal vectors). Attributes contain the buffer,
datatype and size information. But I think this is not essential. The buffer
for vertices and normal are usual one big array, used in two blocks:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 08:25:35 +, Mitch Curtis wrote:
This how I do it ( see https://github.com/uwerat/qskinny ):
QT += quick quick-private
CONFIG += no_private_qt_headers_warning
To get rid of warnings from Qt headers, when doing pedantic checks I also
have the following lines:
linux {
In qtquickcontrols2.git [1] it’s linked to like this:
QT_PRIVATE += quick-private
I think QT += quick-private also works.. not sure what the difference is.
[1]
http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtquickcontrols2.git/tree/src/quicktemplates2/quicktemplates2.pro#n6
On 1/16/18, 4:43 PM, "Interest on behal
14 matches
Mail list logo
