Re: [Interest] qt.git: broken v5.6.0 .gitmodules?

2017-12-09 Thread Christian Gagneraud
On 10 December 2017 at 20:01, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sábado, 9 de dezembro de 2017 22:00:24 PST Christian Gagneraud wrote: >> > Correct, the branches don't exist anymore. The commits still do. >> >> Is it me or this is a serious issue? > > It's just you. The commits still exist and that's all

Re: [Interest] qt.git: broken v5.6.0 .gitmodules?

2017-12-09 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sábado, 9 de dezembro de 2017 22:00:24 PST Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > Correct, the branches don't exist anymore. The commits still do. > > Is it me or this is a serious issue? It's just you. The commits still exist and that's all that counts. > I need linux-32 custom build of Qt-5.6.x (an

Re: [Interest] qt.git: broken v5.6.0 .gitmodules?

2017-12-09 Thread Christian Gagneraud
On 10 December 2017 at 18:13, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sábado, 9 de dezembro de 2017 19:30:41 PST Christian Gagneraud wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> Is it me or .gitmodules on tag v5.6.0 is broken? >> .gitmodules set the branch name of all qt modules to '5.6.0', but >> these branches don't exist (an

Re: [Interest] qt.git: broken v5.6.0 .gitmodules?

2017-12-09 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sábado, 9 de dezembro de 2017 19:30:41 PST Christian Gagneraud wrote: > Hi there, > > Is it me or .gitmodules on tag v5.6.0 is broken? > .gitmodules set the branch name of all qt modules to '5.6.0', but > these branches don't exist (anymore?). The only branches available on > qt submodules are

Re: [Interest] Interest Digest, Vol 75, Issue 5

2017-12-09 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sábado, 9 de dezembro de 2017 10:39:43 PST Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 09/12/17 19:39, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On sábado, 9 de dezembro de 2017 07:51:11 PST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > >> That's a shame indeed. Redirecting people one by one to > >> http://download.qt.io/official_releases/qt

[Interest] qt.git: broken v5.6.0 .gitmodules?

2017-12-09 Thread Christian Gagneraud
Hi there, Is it me or .gitmodules on tag v5.6.0 is broken? .gitmodules set the branch name of all qt modules to '5.6.0', but these branches don't exist (anymore?). The only branches available on qt submodules are '5.6, '5.7', ... and tags like 'v5.6.0', 'v5.6.1', ... git clone $qt5url cd qt5 git

[Interest] how to change color of placeholderText in Quick Controls 2 TextField ?

2017-12-09 Thread Alexander Ivash
Do I understand correctly that the only way to achieve it - is to create new style and specify it in config? I ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Re: [Interest] Interest Digest, Vol 75, Issue 5

2017-12-09 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 09/12/17 19:39, Thiago Macieira wrote: On sábado, 9 de dezembro de 2017 07:51:11 PST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: That's a shame indeed. Redirecting people one by one to http://download.qt.io/official_releases/qt/ doesn't scale well. It takes two clicks to go from https://qt.io to https://www.

Re: [Interest] Interest Digest, Vol 75, Issue 5

2017-12-09 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sábado, 9 de dezembro de 2017 07:51:11 PST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > That's a shame indeed. Redirecting people one by one to > http://download.qt.io/official_releases/qt/ doesn't scale well. It takes two clicks to go from https://qt.io to https://www.qt.io/download-qt-for-application-develop

Re: [Interest] Interest Digest, Vol 75, Issue 5

2017-12-09 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
> On 12/09/2017 08:21 AM, Oliver Niebuhr wrote: > >> I already contacted Digia directly and asked them this and other >> Questions. Also gave those and more Details. But the only answer after a >> few weeks was: "Thanks for contacting us. Please tell us what License >> you want to buy" etc. They

Re: [Interest] Interest Digest, Vol 75, Issue 5

2017-12-09 Thread Roland Hughes
On 12/09/2017 08:21 AM,  Oliver Niebuhr wrote: I already contacted Digia directly and asked them this and other Questions. Also gave those and more Details. But the only answer after a few weeks was: "Thanks for contacting us. Please tell us what License you want to buy" etc. They seem to hate th

Re: [Interest] Can't deploy anymore on QtCretor 4.5

2017-12-09 Thread Xavier Bigand
I figured out how to fix the issue with playservices, but now I have a new one : Generating Android Package Input file: D:/Dev/Koalabs/HomeDesign3D/Projects/build-HomeDesign3D-Android_for_armeabi_v7a_GCC_4_9_Qt_5_9_3_for_Android_armv7-Debug/android-libHomeDesign3D.so-deployment-settings.json Out

Re: [Interest] Can't deploy anymore on QtCretor 4.5

2017-12-09 Thread Xavier Bigand
I got a lot more errors by doing that, so I put it back some of our configurations in the manifest while taking care of keeping changes of QtCreator, and I still have same errors. Sadly this workaround doesn't work for me. 2017-12-09 11:11 GMT+01:00 Nikos Chantziaras : > I ran into issues myse

Re: [Interest] Can't deploy anymore on QtCretor 4.5

2017-12-09 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
I ran into issues myself going from 4.4 to 4.5. But I didn't delve too long into solving them manually. What I did instead is take a complete backup of my project (this should go without saying, obviously,) and then delete the Android files. Then I regenerated the Android files and re-applied m

Re: [Interest] Can't deploy anymore on QtCretor 4.5

2017-12-09 Thread Xavier Bigand
Yes, but QtCreator 4.4 had a bug when we get the SDK from Android Studio instead of the stand alone version that is no more accessible. QtCreator 4.5 which support the SDK from Android Studio tells me that everything is ok with my Android configuration, but now with gradle instead of ant I can't d