Re: [Interest] QMake, (static) libraries and LTCG (LTO) on Mac

2017-11-13 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 13 de novembro de 2017 03:24:46 PST René J. V. Bertin wrote: > Thiago Macieira wrote: > > it's a limitation of your environment. Static linking LTCG precompiled > > code > > requires a special linker. It's not very well supported everywhere. > > Erm, this is on Mac, and I am usin

[Interest] Performance comparison of painting methods

2017-11-13 Thread Jean-Michaël Celerier
http://kgronholm.blogspot.fr/2017/11/qt-510-qml-shape-testing.html An interesting blog post which compares QPainter, the upcoming QML Shapes and QNanoPainter. I'm surprised to see QML Shapes perform so much slower than good old QPainter. Best, Jean-Michaël

Re: [Interest] QMake, (static) libraries and LTCG (LTO) on Mac

2017-11-13 Thread René J . V . Bertin
Thiago Macieira wrote: > it's a limitation of your environment. Static linking LTCG precompiled code > requires a special linker. It's not very well supported everywhere. Erm, this is on Mac, and I am using a much more recent linker editor than the one from the system. I've been able to build Q

Re: [Interest] [Development] Short/medium term evolution of the Assistant?

2017-11-13 Thread René J . V . Bertin
Kai Koehne wrote: >> 1) make qttools depend on qtwebengine --- I'm clearly not alone in thinking that QWE is serious overkill for documentation browsing. I'd rather explore solutions that involve using a HTML-rendering framework that's even leaner than QtWebkit in a "minimal" configuration. Kh