On Friday, 1 September 2017 16:42:08 PDT Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> doc.qt.io says that for Qt 5.9, the supported platform contains:
> Linux 32/64-bit: GCC 4.8, GCC 4.9, GCC 5.3
>
> According to your gcc bug report, the bug was introduced in gcc 5.1
> but has never been fixed (?)
Correct. We ju
On 2 September 2017 at 04:42, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Thursday, 31 August 2017 23:37:37 PDT Christian Gagneraud wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> Back on my 32 bits build of Qt
>>
>> I'm having a build failure on tst_qatomicinteger for qlonglong.
>>
>> Static failure: Q_STATIC_ASSERT(Q_ALIGNOF(QAtomic
On Thursday, 31 August 2017 23:37:37 PDT Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Back on my 32 bits build of Qt
>
> I'm having a build failure on tst_qatomicinteger for qlonglong.
>
> Static failure: Q_STATIC_ASSERT(Q_ALIGNOF(QAtomicInteger) ==
> Q_ALIGNOF(TypeInStruct));
>
> Sounds very muc
You are using QtIFW and you do not like rigid limitations on the name and
version of packages - vote for optional freedom!
Suggestion:
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTIFW-948
Apropriate change request:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/203958
--
Regards,
Konstantin Podsvirov
___
Hi Christian.
May be changing
template
class QBasicAtomicInteger
in "src/corelib/thread/qbasicatomic.h" to
template
class Q_DECL_ALIGN(Q_ALIGNOF(typename QAtomicOps::Type))
QBasicAtomicInteger
will fix the problem.
On 09/01/2017 11:10 AM, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> On 1 September 2017 at
On 1 September 2017 at 19:21, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> On 1 September 2017 at 18:37, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> Back on my 32 bits build of Qt
>>
>> I'm having a build failure on tst_qatomicinteger for qlonglong.
>>
>> Static failure: Q_STATIC_ASSERT(Q_ALIGNOF(QAtomicIntege
On 1 September 2017 at 18:37, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Back on my 32 bits build of Qt
>
> I'm having a build failure on tst_qatomicinteger for qlonglong.
>
> Static failure: Q_STATIC_ASSERT(Q_ALIGNOF(QAtomicInteger) ==
> Q_ALIGNOF(TypeInStruct));
>
> Sounds very much like a 32/64
