Thanks Elvis, much appreciated!
On 19/01/17 7:55 PM, Elvis Stansvik wrote:
2017-01-19 1:10 GMT+01:00 Thiago Macieira :
On quarta-feira, 18 de janeiro de 2017 20:04:41 PST Elvis Stansvik wrote:
If you have one QThread that depends on the completion of another,
then no, I don't think there's a
2017-01-19 1:10 GMT+01:00 Thiago Macieira :
> On quarta-feira, 18 de janeiro de 2017 20:04:41 PST Elvis Stansvik wrote:
>> If you have one QThread that depends on the completion of another,
>> then no, I don't think there's a convenient API in Qt to express that
>> relationship and run the threads
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 04:09:41PM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 19 de janeiro de 2017 00:20:03 PST Prav wrote:
> > So finally : Qt version 5.8.0 can NOT be build under Win7 with Win7SDK!? (It
> > seems Qt for desktop need some definitions from WinRT ... who know why)
>
> Qt 5.8
OK, thanks Thiago and Elvis.
I think I got the picture now and can proceed knowing I'm not heading
into a dead end.
Cheers,
frank
On 19/01/17 1:10 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quarta-feira, 18 de janeiro de 2017 20:04:41 PST Elvis Stansvik wrote:
If you have one QThread that depends on the
On quarta-feira, 18 de janeiro de 2017 20:04:41 PST Elvis Stansvik wrote:
> If you have one QThread that depends on the completion of another,
> then no, I don't think there's a convenient API in Qt to express that
> relationship and run the threads in sequence. You'll have to string
> them togethe
On quinta-feira, 19 de janeiro de 2017 00:20:03 PST Prav wrote:
> So finally : Qt version 5.8.0 can NOT be build under Win7 with Win7SDK!? (It
> seems Qt for desktop need some definitions from WinRT ... who know why)
Qt 5.8 can be built under Win7, but you should use the Win10SDK. The reason
for
On quinta-feira, 19 de janeiro de 2017 00:40:22 PST Prav wrote:
> Hello, Thiago.
>
> > -no-rtti is not tested and clearly someone broke it. I've submitted a
> > change to remove that option from configure starting with Qt 5.8.1.
>
> I was thinking that without RTTI compiled programs became lig
Hello, Thiago.
> -no-rtti is not tested and clearly someone broke it. I've submitted a change
> to remove that option from configure starting with Qt 5.8.1.
I was thinking that without RTTI compiled programs became lighter and faster
(but never saw values of how much)
As I can see Qt tries to
Thanks Tim,
yes, that thought had crossed my mind while I was converting to
QRunnables. The latter seems to give me the control for what I need in
the main controller code without having to adjust the downloader class,
so I will see if that behaves through some testing.
But it's certainly goo
Title: Re: [Interest] Qt 5.8.0 RC build under windows
Hello, Mike.
>Mike Chinander:
>I compiled Qt 5.8.0 RC on Windows 7 with MSVC2013 and the Windows 8 SDK.
OK. I got it. You are right ... there is no error with building of qwin10helpers.cpp with Win8SDK.
So finally : Qt version 5.8.0 can NOT
Thanks Elvis.
And my apologies (especially to Thiago) for posting a misleading and
incopmlete question.
I have been playing with converting to QRunner which seems to work fine
(haven't tested it thoroughly though).
I will have a look at QNetworkAccessManager so I can compare the
approaches, t
2017-01-18 20:11 GMT+01:00 Elvis Stansvik :
> 2017-01-18 20:04 GMT+01:00 Elvis Stansvik :
>> 2017-01-18 8:17 GMT+01:00 Frank Rueter | OHUfx :
>>> Hi Thiago,
>>>
>>> thanks for your quick reply. I will try and give some more context:
>>> I use the python requests module inside my PySide app to post
2017-01-18 20:04 GMT+01:00 Elvis Stansvik :
> 2017-01-18 8:17 GMT+01:00 Frank Rueter | OHUfx :
>> Hi Thiago,
>>
>> thanks for your quick reply. I will try and give some more context:
>> I use the python requests module inside my PySide app to post requests to a
>> website. Some of those requests re
2017-01-18 8:17 GMT+01:00 Frank Rueter | OHUfx :
> Hi Thiago,
>
> thanks for your quick reply. I will try and give some more context:
> I use the python requests module inside my PySide app to post requests to a
> website. Some of those requests return a lot of data that I need to parse to
> be abl
On 1/18/2017 10:52 AM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
Il 18/01/2017 18:16, Bob Hood ha scritto:
Is QTest capable of testing deferred results--i.e., evaluating tests results
after the even loop has run again--or can only synchronous actions be tested?
I know people have used qWait() and such in the pas
On 1/18/2017 10:28 AM, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday, January 18, 2017 10:16:30 Bob Hood wrote:
I'm trying to develop a unit test for an deferred signal; i.e. one that
won't be emitted until the event loop has been allowed to run. The case
looks like:
void MyTest::user_info_def
Il 18/01/2017 18:16, Bob Hood ha scritto:
> Is QTest capable of testing deferred results--i.e., evaluating tests results
> after the even loop has run again--or can only synchronous actions be tested?
>
> I know people have used qWait() and such in the past, or I supposed I could
> manually in
Hi,
On Wednesday, January 18, 2017 10:16:30 Bob Hood wrote:
> I'm trying to develop a unit test for an deferred signal; i.e. one that
> won't be emitted until the event loop has been allowed to run. The case
> looks like:
>
>void MyTest::user_info_deferred()
>{
>QVERIFY(qnam_clas
I'm trying to develop a unit test for an deferred signal; i.e. one that won't
be emitted until the event loop has been allowed to run. The case looks like:
void MyTest::user_info_deferred()
{
QVERIFY(qnam_class_ptr != nullptr);
QSignalSpy spy(qnam_class_ptr, &QNAMClass::signal_
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:04 AM, Prav wrote:
>
> Does anyone know about requirements of using Win10SDK for Qt 5.8.0? Is
> Win10SDK is really necessary to build Qt even for Win7 or it is bug in Qt
> build system?
I compiled Qt 5.8.0 RC on Windows 7 with MSVC2013 and the Windows 8 SDK.
__
instead of re-architecting your threading model, could you just tweak the
downloader class to
take a list of files and then each one would be synchronous. multiple
concurrent downloads would each have a list of 1 file.
just a thought...
--
Tim Iskander
Senior Engineer
Critical Link LLC (315) 425-
Hi,
We have a Yocto toolchain for embedded Linux images with Qt 4.8.6. The
Qt receipes are from openembedded-core / recipes-qt.
I now want to include QtSerialPort into this image without upgrading Qt.
So I wrote my own bitbake recipe and can build QtSerialPort sucessfully.
My problem is to
Hi,
I have a gentoo-prefix like local set-up under Linux with an installation under
/opt/local that holds among others Qt5 (5.7.1 currently):
/opt/local/libexec/qt5 : libraries & binaries
/opt/local/share/qt5 : plugins and other shared stuff not linked or called
directly
I've observed that I c
23 matches
Mail list logo
