On 10/05/2016 04:15 AM, interest-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
I don't think that agile programming is a suitable approach for
back-end code like file-formats, network-protocols, APIs,
frameworks etc.
It's okay for quickly evolving UX, but we are talking about
long-term concepts that need to pr
On 10/05/2016 03:14 AM, interest-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
But the bug reports inhttps://bugreports.qt.io are part of the Qt Project,
the open source side of it (just like this mailing list, actually). If you
report issues via the professional support contract, you get a different
person, d
This would be the second 2 fatal flaws with Agile.
Developer's choice
1 and done mentality/management. Actually that is better than some of
the Agile groups at equipment manufacturers, some of them demand their
developers commit 3 completed stories per day.
Big ugly Ogre on steroids type bug
On 10/04/2016 06:31 PM, interest-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
I think the bigger issue, that many people have expressed here, but not said as
such, is the Qt release cycle is not Agile.
I would thank God it is not, but the rest of your post proves that it is.
As more teams adopt Agile develo
On 09/28/2016 12:25 PM, interest-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
Don't you have unit tests?
Yes. But which is better, to be forced to use an inherently error-prone
language (JavaScript) and rely on unit tests to clean up the mess, or to
use a robust modern language (C++) and have less bugs to fin
Hi,
This is a long shot and possibly sort of off topic. I've started using
emacs recently after working on QtCreator primarily for years. I can't use
QtCreator easily in my current work environment.
Does anyone have keybindings for emacs that make it feel closer to
QtCreator?
Preet
