Re: [Interest] What don't you like about Qt?

> On 18 Sep 2016, at 02:37, Xavier Bigand wrote: > > I am using Qt for my day job, > > Our first difficulty with Qt is the release cycle that is really long and the > difficulty to test the futur versions. > As we often need the latest features or bug fixes, waiting 3-4 month isn't > possible

Re: [Interest] What don't you like about Qt?

Qt 5.7 has a lot of improves and I think that you should use this version… I have no problem installing Qt on Windows… I install VS Community Edition with the compilers for C++ and then, I use the online installer for Windows given by Qt website… Also, you need to know that you should install Wind

Re: [Interest] Qt, running as root (sudo/setuid), DBus and OS X

On 19 September 2016 at 07:56, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sexta-feira, 16 de setembro de 2016 14:22:03 PDT René J.V. Bertin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Is it possible to use Qt-based applications on OS X that run with elevated >> privileges (= as root), in general and > > It's possible, but not recommend

Re: [Interest] Qt, running as root (sudo/setuid), DBus and OS X

On sexta-feira, 16 de setembro de 2016 14:22:03 PDT René J.V. Bertin wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possible to use Qt-based applications on OS X that run with elevated > privileges (= as root), in general and It's possible, but not recommended. > if they need to connect to the user's session dbus? It

Re: [Interest] Qt, running as root (sudo/setuid), DBus and OS X

On 18 September 2016 at 18:23, Roland Hughes wrote: > >> > > Hi, > > Is it possible to use Qt-based applications on OS X that run with elevated > privileges (= as root), in general and if they need to connect to the > user's session dbus? > > --- > > Typically you need to look at QApplication doc

Re: [Interest] Qt, running as root (sudo/setuid), DBus and OS X

>> Hi, Is it possible to use Qt-based applications on OS X that run with elevated privileges (= as root), in general and if they need to connect to the user's session dbus? --- Typically you need to look at QApplication documentation. There is something you have to set in that class BEFORE

Re: [Interest] What don't you like about Qt?

I'm a Linux user but a guy at work was trying out Qt on windows for a project he was working on. He tried the new installer and it didn't come preconfigured with a compiler like it used to. I didn't have time to trouble shoot it so I just had him download 5.5 because that one works without any m

Re: [Interest] What don't you like about Qt?

Hi Nate, I’m a macOS user and I hate Windows, but right now I’m involve in a big project developed with QML, Qt Widgets and C++ (because we have various apps for desktop and mobile). In Windows I only had problem with the compiler from Visual Studio, which has a lot of problem with the compatibili

Re: [Interest] What don't you like about Qt?

I like C++ & QML. I don't like that the new version of Qt for windows is so hard to get working! Qt 5.5 worked right out of the box, no need to monkey around with compilers and everything else. I really don't like that Nate Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 12:48 PM, B

Re: [Interest] What don't you like about Qt?

On 18 September 2016 at 21:56, Bob Hood wrote: > On 9/18/2016 2:43 AM, Jean-Michaël Celerier wrote: > >> Some things that bother me : >> >> * Features being QML-only instead of being usable from C++. I like coding >> in C++ (but I agree it's hard). >> > > This is certainly arguable. For some, I

Re: [Interest] What don't you like about Qt?

It would be more confortable to have more artifacts for 2 reasons : 1. As we constantly update our product based on Qt (our release cycle is between 3 and 6 months), reducing the delay to migrate to the latest version of Qt (to improve the stability, performances, compatibility,...) when come clos

Re: [Interest] What don't you like about Qt?

On 9/18/2016 2:43 AM, Jean-Michaël Celerier wrote: Some things that bother me : * Features being QML-only instead of being usable from C++. I like coding in C++ (but I agree it's hard). This is certainly arguable. For some, I guess coding in C++ is hard. For others, it's as natural as brea

Re: [Interest] What don't you like about Qt?

On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 02:37:01AM +0200, Xavier Bigand wrote: > I am using Qt for my day job, > > Our first difficulty with Qt is the release cycle that is really long and the > difficulty to test the futur versions. As we often need the latest features > or > bug fixes, waiting 3-4 month isn't

Re: [Interest] Dealing with Qt 4.x docs in Google searches (Was: "What don't you like about Qt?")

2016-09-18 11:41 GMT+02:00 Jean-Michaël Celerier : > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Sze Howe Koh > wrote: >> >> >> >> It lets you filter Google searches such that only your specified >> version of Qt is shown. > > > Nice, I use Firefox but that's a good thing to share :) > I just tried : QObj

Re: [Interest] Dealing with Qt 4.x docs in Google searches (Was: "What don't you like about Qt?")

On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Sze Howe Koh wrote: > > > > It lets you filter Google searches such that only your specified > version of Qt is shown. Nice, I use Firefox but that's a good thing to share :) I just tr

[Interest] Dealing with Qt 4.x docs in Google searches (Was: "What don't you like about Qt?")

On 18 September 2016 at 16:43, Jean-Michaël Celerier wrote: > > Some things that bother me : > > * The (perceived) lack of stability with QtQuick / QML : first there was > QtQuick with 4.8, then QtQuick 2.0, maybe QtQuick 3.0 with Qt 6 ? Then > Controls 1.0, then Controls 2.0 ... everytime with

Re: [Interest] What don't you like about Qt?

Some things that bother me : * The (perceived) lack of stability with QtQuick / QML : first there was QtQuick with 4.8, then QtQuick 2.0, maybe QtQuick 3.0 with Qt 6 ? Then Controls 1.0, then Controls 2.0 ... everytime with a somewhat short life-span, which makes it a pain when looking for documen

[Interest] Best approach for html5 application

Hello, I've already developed several web-based application using Qt5 as engine for data processing. The webpages are accessed from remote terminal, often from smartphones. Here my current approach: - on the server machine (often a small SBC) I run any http server, i.e. lighttpd - I develop

[Interest] RowLayout overlap when resize the app

Hello, I created a layout for my app, inside a Flickable put a ColumnLayout with 3 RowLayout, inside each RowLayout I put a ListView, like show in the code at the end. The app show like in the following link http://imgur.com/a/yftsQ But when I change the size of the app the last RowLayout over