I have just received the email below from Google Play. Has anyone had the same
report?
Since I use QtPurchasing to handle my purchases, I was wondering if this
something I need to add, or something that needs to be added to the lib itself.
Nuno
> Hello Google Play Developer,
>
> We detected th
+1 Well said, and really the source of my frustration.
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 12:39 PM
From: "Michael Brasser"
To: "J-P Nurmi" , "interest@qt-project.org"
Subject: Re: [Interest] Why does QML prefer 'count' over '.length'?
Hi,
While I don't have anything to add on the re
On quarta-feira, 27 de julho de 2016 21:38:21 PDT Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
> Now, my tool in reality doesn't need libudev at all, so just to "hack"
> it I created a soft link of .0 to .1... :) And walla it ran fine.
That's not recommended. The soname changed because something was removed or
chan
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 28 de julho de 2016 17:00:01 PDT Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Qt 5.6 should work just fine under Visual Studio 2010, but i can't find
> the
> > binary release [1]. It starts with Visual Studio 2013 in that folder.
>
Hi,
While I don't have anything to add on the relative merits of length vs count ,
I do understand the general frustration.
With large QML projects there can be a large number of "data collections".
Those might be implemented in terms of ListModel, a custom
QAbstractListModel-derived class, QS
On quinta-feira, 28 de julho de 2016 17:00:01 PDT Mark Gaiser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Qt 5.6 should work just fine under Visual Studio 2010, but i can't find the
> binary release [1]. It starts with Visual Studio 2013 in that folder.
>
> Is Qt not providing a 2010 build anymore?
We're not. Feel free to
On Thursday, July 28, 2016 15:46, Jason H wrote:
> Look, I know JS was invented in 10 days back in 1995. There's no shortage of
> things to complain about. But
> 'length' was chosen, and it is the number of items. I would agree with you
> that length is not as good as 'count', but
> the language
Hi,
Qt 5.6 should work just fine under Visual Studio 2010, but i can't find the
binary release [1]. It starts with Visual Studio 2013 in that folder.
Is Qt not providing a 2010 build anymore?
Best regards,
Mark
[1] https://download.qt.io/official_releases/qt/5.6/5.6.1-1/
___
> It makes perfect sense. "count" makes sense for visual things. "length" only
> means "amount" in computer science, and only then in the realm of containers.
> You don't say "white blood cell length" when referring to the amount of blood
> white cells, you say "white blood cell count". You don'
Do you have any issues creating a standard Qt Quick Controls 2 application
against a static Qt? I just tried with a very basic application and it worked
without issues (Ubuntu 16.04, Qt 5.7).
From: Interest [mailto:interest-bounces+mitch.curtis=qt...@qt-project.org] On
Behalf Of Nuno Santos
Sen
> -Original Message-
> From: Interest [mailto:interest-bounces+mitch.curtis=qt...@qt-project.org]
> On Behalf Of Jason H
> Sent: Wednesday, 27 July 2016 4:32 PM
> To: J-P Nurmi
> Cc: interest@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Interest] Why does QML prefer 'count' over '.length'?
>
>
>
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
