Hi All,
I am using QtQuick 1.0 with Qt 5.5.0.
With LinuxFB as Windowing System.
I am getting white is showing as yellow
and blue is showing as green etc.,
Images are getting displayed properly.
It is problem with Windowing System ?
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Basha.
__
Hi, you can use QSignalMapper to help you keep track of which spinbox
got clicked on, example:
-
for (int r = 0; (r < ui->tableWidget->rowCount()); ++r)
for (int c = 0; (c < ui->tableWidget->columnCount()); ++c)
Does anyone have any recommendations for the Right Way to map QWidgets that are
inside QTableWidget cells - populated with QTableWidget::setCellWidget() - back
to the cell index that holds the widget?
When populating the table, I'm putting widgets in various cells (QSpinBoxes for
example). Base
Um... that's Java code.
See http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtquickcontrols-touch-main-qml.html for a QML Back button mapping using stack view.
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 at 1:38 PM
From: "Nuno Santos"
To: "Qt Interest"
Subject: Re: [Interest] Back button crashes Qt app on Android
It seems that b
Thiago,
Thanks for your explanation.
I will try to understand if it is bringing me benefits or not.
Regards,
Nuno
> On 03 May 2016, at 18:18, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> On terça-feira, 3 de maio de 2016 18:14:11 PDT Nuno Santos wrote:
>> Because, from my experience with the code compiled f
It seems that back button by default deletes the activity. It seems that I’m
not able to override the back button action and therefore, it is killing my
activity. During this delete force, it is crashing the app.
Any special remarks in order to override the back button function on a Qt
Android
Given code like below where JSON data is used to populate a ListModel
- I run into loading issues on mobile when the number of objects
returned is greater than a couple thousand.s
Once the item is rendered it performs as expected, but the time to
ready is often beyond user acceptance.
Any sugge
Interesting... Besides Android, is it worth considering -O3 for
Linux/OS-X/Windows for a heavy-calculation application ?
Philippe Lelong
Le 03-05-2016 19:18, Thiago Macieira a écrit :
On terça-feira, 3 de maio de 2016 18:14:11 PDT Nuno Santos wrote:
Because, from my experience with the code co
03.05.2016, 20:14, "Nuno Santos" :
> Because, from my experience with the code compiled for Intel, putting -O3
> made a huge difference on the processing code of my audio app. But the same
> might not be valid for arm. That’s why I’m asking.
Note that embedded CPUs usually have small caches, s
On terça-feira, 3 de maio de 2016 18:14:11 PDT Nuno Santos wrote:
> Because, from my experience with the code compiled for Intel, putting -O3
> made a huge difference on the processing code of my audio app. But the same
> might not be valid for arm. That’s why I’m asking.
-O3 not only enables all
Because, from my experience with the code compiled for Intel, putting -O3 made
a huge difference on the processing code of my audio app. But the same might
not be valid for arm. That’s why I’m asking.
I’m trying to squeeze the most of the C++ code performance on Android.
> On 03 May 2016, at 1
>From https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html
-Os
Optimize for size. -Os enables all -O2 optimizations that do not typically
increase code size. It also performs further optimizations designed to
reduce code size.
-Os disables the following optimization flags:
-falign-f
Em terça-feira, 3 de maio de 2016, às 18:00:07 PDT, Nuno Santos escreveu:
> I mean -O2, like the others
You didn't answer why you think that it's important to use -O2 instead of -Os.
The reason why it's using -Os instead of -O2 was probably because the
maintainers of the Android port thought tha
Em terça-feira, 3 de maio de 2016, às 18:45:23 PDT, Jerome escreveu:
> from my code, #include
> goes on /usr/include/deviceinterface.h
>
> sudo find /usr -name deviceinterface.h -type f
>
> /usr/include/KF5/Solid/solid/deviceinterface.h
> /usr/include/solid/deviceinterface.h
>
> but why QT5.6 de
I mean -O2, like the others
Nuno Santos
Founder / CEO / CTO
www.imaginando.pt
+351 91 621 69 62
> On 03 May 2016, at 06:27, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> On segunda-feira, 2 de maio de 2016 22:07:03 PDT Nuno Santos wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Below are the CFLAGS for Android
>> (Qt/5.6/android_armv7/mksp
Dear Kai,
thank you. Indeed, I tryed again with the correct syntax and it worked.
I missed to explicitly call the nmake install with
nmake install INSTALL_ROOT=C:\test
and
nmake deployqt INSTALL_ROOT=C:\test
Now it works. deployartifacts not , but it doesn't matter.
BTW, when running:
- v4.0.0rc f
On segunda-feira, 2 de maio de 2016 23:30:21 PDT Philippe wrote:
> Where/How can one get an idea about the release date of Qt 5.6.1?
>
> I know about bugreports.qt.io, but though there are only a few issues left
> for several weeks, I hardly see any progress.
Please follow the releasing mailing l
On segunda-feira, 2 de maio de 2016 22:07:03 PDT Nuno Santos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Below are the CFLAGS for Android
> (Qt/5.6/android_armv7/mkspecs/android-g++/qmake.conf)
>
> I’m wondering why there are no optimisation settings for arm rather than
> size. Is there any specific reason?
Why should the
Nope. WORKSFORME.
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 at 10:09 AM
From: "Nuno Santos"
To: "Qt Interest"
Subject: [Interest] Back button crashes Qt app on Android
Hi,
I have noticed the if I press the back button in a Qt Android app, it crashes.
Does anyone here had the same problem?
Rega
Hi,
I have noticed the if I press the back button in a Qt Android app, it crashes.
Does anyone here had the same problem?
Regards,
Nuno
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
Hi All,
I am using QtQuick 1.0 with Qt 5.5.0.
With LinuxFB as Windowing System.
I am getting white is showing as yellow
and blue is showing as green etc.,If some image is rendered
colors are working fine.
Same UI is working fine on the Desktop.
It is problem Windowing System on target?
Thank
> -Original Message-
> From: Interest [mailto:interest-bounces+kai.koehne=qt...@qt-project.org]
> On Behalf Of Thomas (QbProg)
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 2:08 PM
> To: interest@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Interest] Building QtCreator (2015)
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to build QtCreator
Hello,
I'm trying to build QtCreator (4.0 branch), using the msvc2015 distribution
from the official online installer.
https://wiki.qt.io/Building-Qt-Creator-Packages
I'm following the instructions so I do from a VS command prompt
set path=%path%;C:\Qt\5.6\msvc2015\
set INSTALL_ROOT=C:\test\
qmake
from my code, #include
goes on /usr/include/deviceinterface.h
sudo find /usr -name deviceinterface.h -type f
/usr/include/KF5/Solid/solid/deviceinterface.h
/usr/include/solid/deviceinterface.h
but why QT5.6 decide alone to go search this file i never ask for that.
Also, what i can do for tell hi
from my code, #include
goes on /usr/include/deviceinterface.h
sudo find /usr -name deviceinterface.h -type f
/usr/include/KF5/Solid/solid/deviceinterface.h
/usr/include/solid/deviceinterface.h
but why QT5.6 decide alone to go search this file i never ask for that.
Also, what i can do for tell hi
Em terça-feira, 3 de maio de 2016, às 09:18:29 PDT, Rainer Wiesenfarth
escreveu:
> LicenseeWiesenfarth Rainer
> License ID..
> Product license.Enterprise Edition
> Expiry Date.
>
> Is this the expected behavior?
Sorry, I wouldn't kn
Am 02.05.2016 um 18:11 schrieb Thiago Macieira:
On segunda-feira, 2 de maio de 2016 11:24:33 PDT Rainer Wiesenfarth wrote:
I would simply delete the LICENSE.PREVIEW.COMMERCIAL, but licheck.exe is not
available...
Hmm... the removal of LICENCE.PREVIEW.COMMERCIAL and addition of the actual
comme
27 matches
Mail list logo
