2015-08-21 17:59 GMT+02:00 Thiago Macieira :
> Yes, it is. It added static members only to your class.
Perfect, thanks!
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
This will not work in every case because you cannot guarantee that your
hash function generates a unique value for every string. In hash based
containers you still have to compare against the valueof the string.
Am 24.08.2015 01:27 schrieb "mark diener" :
> Hello List:
>
> Have you ever wanted an
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Hi Again,
> No thoghts about the matter?
>
> >From https://wiki.qt.io/New_Features_in_Qt_5.5:
> "You can now have Q_PROPERTY and Q_INVOKABLE within a Q_GADGET [...]"
>
> But there's no QJSEngine::newQGadget() so is my only solution is the
>
Hi there,
Since some previous Qt5 version, Q_PROPERTIES of type QList
are automatically registered for use in QML as models as well as
accessible from QJSEngine. Now I'd like to use Q_PROPERTIES of type
QList but those aren't automatically registered in QJSEngine
and also there is no QScriptEngine
Hello List:
Have you ever wanted an efficient switch statement on QString values?
There are many references to the subject with various algorithms, but they
all have some major flaw in the implementation.
For those looking for a way to have compile and run time hash on their
strings, I spent a l
From: interest-bounces+mitch.curtis=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
on behalf of
mark diener
Sent: Sunday, 23 August 2015 05:40
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: [Interest] Accessing QML Loader from C++
Hello List:
Does anybody have an idea on how to retrieve the QObject* from C++
with a Q
