On Saturday 04 July 2015 11:14:36 Bob Hood wrote:
> IMO, that seems like a sure formula for failure to me. If you want
> success, you have to look beyond today. It may cost you initially, as
> long as you can forecast an ROI that exceeds today's investment.
Anyone who's done a class of business
On Saturday 04 July 2015 21:36:29 Kate Alhola wrote:
> But i proposed alternative that does not cost anything but may bring a lot
> of profits later.
I think you're wrong. There's a cost associated with the program, at least to
keep the website running, with the online store and registration, and
Hello Alex,
Thanks for your response!
If I start the scanning using the MinimalDiscovery mode it
successfully discover the SPP service. I don't know why.
Probably the information was cached after using sdptool.
To be honest, I don't exactly understand the difference
between these two modes (mi
+1
> Il giorno 04/lug/2015, alle ore 20:36, Kate Alhola ha
> scritto:
>
>
>> On 04 Jul 2015, at 20:14, Bob Hood wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/4/2015 10:53 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Saturday 04 July 2015 18:33:50 Harri Pasanen wrote:
> On 04/07/2015 14:51, Kate Alhola wrote:
> allow sal
On 7/4/2015 12:36 PM, Kate Alhola wrote:
>
>> On 04 Jul 2015, at 20:14, Bob Hood wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/4/2015 10:53 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Saturday 04 July 2015 18:33:50 Harri Pasanen wrote:
> On 04/07/2015 14:51, Kate Alhola wrote:
> allow sales in appstore for this 1€/month
> On 04 Jul 2015, at 20:14, Bob Hood wrote:
>
>> On 7/4/2015 10:53 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>> On Saturday 04 July 2015 18:33:50 Harri Pasanen wrote:
On 04/07/2015 14:51, Kate Alhola wrote:
allow sales in appstore for this 1€/month with OSS version before
professional licen
On 7/4/2015 10:53 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Saturday 04 July 2015 18:33:50 Harri Pasanen wrote:
>> On 04/07/2015 14:51, Kate Alhola wrote:
>>> allow sales in appstore for this 1€/month with OSS version before
>>> professional licence is needed.
>> I think this would be a good strategy.
>
On Saturday 04 July 2015 18:33:50 Harri Pasanen wrote:
> On 04/07/2015 14:51, Kate Alhola wrote:
> > allow sales in appstore for this 1€/month with OSS version before
> > professional licence is needed.
>
> I think this would be a good strategy.
Provided it doesn't cost more to run the prog
On 04/07/2015 14:51, Kate Alhola wrote:
> allow sales in appstore for this 1€/month with OSS version before
> professional licence is needed.
I think this would be a good strategy.Personally I don't think Qt on
mobile "is there" yet, in that it is not of sufficient quality accross
mobil
On 03 Jul 2015, at 18:01, Preet wrote:
>> Why Apple and Google give their dev tools free ? They don't make money
>> from long tail either but they
>> know that getting successful apps you need to have this long tail also.
>
> To be fair this is because they don't make money from the tools, they
Hi,
I think this is a self goal.
Nicola
> Il giorno 03/lug/2015, alle ore 14:56, Kate Alhola ha
> scritto:
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Turunen Tuukka
> wrote:
>>
>> All the current Indie Mobile customers can continue with it under the same
>> terms, we are not offering new a
El Friday 03 July 2015, Jason H escribió:
> How can I get the Inherits in QtCreator help? Or is it just not in there?
Both come from the same source code. It could be that the help in the website
is updated dayly from the stable branch, and have more fixes or additions.
Otherwise, if you see thi
12 matches
Mail list logo
