Re: [Interest] QTDbus, Connman & Parameters conversion

2015-03-22 Thread Blasche Alexander
>I have been looking in a way to provide with my app some wifi connection >manager which would >allow the following functionality : >F1 - Enable/disable wifi adapters >F2 - List wifi networks >F3 - connect to a network specifying the Wifi Key >That Api allows me to list networks properly (F2), bu

Re: [Interest] QTDbus, Connman & Parameters conversion

2015-03-22 Thread LongChair .
Hello Thiago,First of all, thanks for taking the time to answer that long message.Yes, you assumption about me making the system wifi control panel is correct.I followed then you advice to go the introspection -> xml -> qdbusxml2cpp -> cpp way.I managed to have the connman manager xml retrieved,

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.5 and Red Hat 5

2015-03-22 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Sunday 22 March 2015 11:36:37 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 21/03/15 20:19, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > RHEL 6.6 comes with glibc 2.12, which isn't affected by these issues. See > > http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=redhat > > > > Again, the problem is RHEL 5, which has glibc 2.5. >

Re: [Interest] [qt-android] How to build qt for android with neon support?

2015-03-22 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Sunday 22 March 2015 10:16:09 Liang Jian wrote: > As you can see, neno is not enabled, what is wrong with my > configuration? Nothing. Neon is never enabled by default. To enable it, edit the mkspec and add the flags: -mfpu=neon You may need to adjust the -march option too. Your

Re: [Interest] bug: qmake ignores CMAKE_CC and CMAKE_CXX while building Qt 5.3.2???

2015-03-22 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Sunday March 22 2015 21:35:47 Samir Aguiar wrote: > I remember that somewhere during the makefile generation qmake runs > xcrun --find clang > and uses the output as the compiler path, ignoring what you set in > QMAKE_CXX. Yes, that's in qtbase/configure, and it basically determines the compil

Re: [Interest] bug: qmake ignores CMAKE_CC and CMAKE_CXX while building Qt 5.3.2???

2015-03-22 Thread Samir Aguiar
> On Sunday March 22 2015 19:01:55 René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > I found the immediate culprit: build/qtbase/qmake/.qmake.stash > This file sets QMAKE_MAC_SDK.macx-clang.macosx.QMAKE_CC etc. to values that > are completely unrelated to what's specified in the mkspec file. I think that > also expl

Re: [Interest] bug: qmake ignores CMAKE_CC and CMAKE_CXX while building Qt 5.3.2???

2015-03-22 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Sunday March 22 2015 19:01:55 René J.V. Bertin wrote: I found the immediate culprit: build/qtbase/qmake/.qmake.stash This file sets QMAKE_MAC_SDK.macx-clang.macosx.QMAKE_CC etc. to values that are completely unrelated to what's specified in the mkspec file. I think that also explains another

Re: [Interest] Is the OpenGL vs Angle distinction important for widget apps?

2015-03-22 Thread Ian Monroe
You are forgetting about QtWebEngine. It needs opengl of some sort regardless of whether you use Qml or QWidgets. On Sun, Mar 22, 2015, 09:30 Agocs Laszlo wrote: > As long as the application is pure widgets, without ever using QOpenGL/QGL > classes or QQuickWidget, it will not attempt to initial

[Interest] qmake ignores CMAKE_CC and CMAKE_CXX while building Qt 5.3.2???

2015-03-22 Thread René J . V . Bertin
Hi, How come that the bootstrap qmake ignores the mkspec's CMAKE_CC and CMAKE_CXX? I see `/usr/bin/clang++` and `/Developer/usr/bin/clang` (for C and ObjC++) when configure runs the config.test tests, and this causes problems because I need to use the clang compiler specified in my mkspec. NB:

Re: [Interest] Is the OpenGL vs Angle distinction important for widget apps?

2015-03-22 Thread Agocs Laszlo
As long as the application is pure widgets, without ever using QOpenGL/QGL classes or QQuickWidget, it will not attempt to initialize any OpenGL stuff. (if that's not the case, it's a bug, we had some of these recently, like QTBUG-43832) This means that not having OpenGL or ANGLE working (or ava

Re: [Interest] Is the OpenGL vs Angle distinction important for widget apps?

2015-03-22 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
On 22 March 2015 at 10:28, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > For applications that don't use Qml and only use QWidget, does it matter > whether Qt was built with OpenGL or Angle on Windows? It still matters because 1) ANGLE means extra dependencies to be shipped along your app 2) ANGLE does not work on

[Interest] building Qt 5.3.2 on OS X 10.6

2015-03-22 Thread René J . V . Bertin
Hello, Sorry if this has already come up recently: what are the compiler requirements to build Qt 5.3.2 on OS X 10.6.8? I just discovered that Apple gcc 4.2 fails on qprintengine_mac.mm, and Apple clang version 3 (211.10.1, the one shipped with the sole Xcode 4 for 10.6) fails during the config

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.5 and Red Hat 5

2015-03-22 Thread Christoph Cullmann
> On 21/03/15 20:19, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Thursday 19 March 2015 14:41:24 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > >> "Qt 5.5 will provide support for Windows 10 (when available) and RedHat > >> Enterprise Linux 6.6." > >> > >> From http://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/03/17/qt-5-5-alpha-available/ > > > > RHE

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.5 and Red Hat 5

2015-03-22 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 21/03/15 20:19, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Thursday 19 March 2015 14:41:24 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >> "Qt 5.5 will provide support for Windows 10 (when available) and RedHat >> Enterprise Linux 6.6." >> >> From http://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/03/17/qt-5-5-alpha-available/ > > RHEL 6.6 comes with

[Interest] Is the OpenGL vs Angle distinction important for widget apps?

2015-03-22 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
For applications that don't use Qml and only use QWidget, does it matter whether Qt was built with OpenGL or Angle on Windows? As far as I can tell, GL/Angle is only used by Qml. Is that true? Can there be any circumstances where a non-Qml application might error out if running with an OpenGL-b