> From: Alexander Ivash
> Sent: 20. januar 2015 19:32
> To: interest@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Interest] Qt Quick UI Forms & item views: best practices
> MouseArea {
> onClicked: root.onClicked(root.model.get(index)); /// this line makes
> QtCreator unhappy :(
> }
Shouldn’t that be root.itemCli
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 21:57:01 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> = Just for the curious, contains debian-specific stuff
>
> Nowadays what we are doing is [0]. Basically it scans private headers and
> uses a special feature of Debian's symbols files, marking private symbols
> to cre
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 11:08:10 Thiago Macieira wrote:
[snip]
> > Then it shouldn't be a problem (understanding a lib part of Qt, as you
> > only
> > replied to that part).
>
> Right.
>
> I meant anything using private API (or, at least, triggering the trick).
> This is intended for Qt libra
bump ...
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Qt 4.8 qt_mac_handleMouseEvent() question (crash-related)
Date: Friday January 16 2015, 21:41:50
From: René J.V. Bertin
To: 'interest@qt-project.org'
Hello,
Hopefully this kind of topic isn't too much out of place on this list:
I kee
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 15:30:47 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 January 2015 08:15:53 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 January 2015 10:25:04 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
>
> wrote:
> > > If the library is part of Qt itself then it will certainly not hu
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 08:15:53 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 January 2015 10:25:04 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> > If the library is part of Qt itself then it will certainly not hurt, but
> > nowadays we need to push all Qt submodules at the same time because there
> >
I was trying to apply new feature (Qt Quick UI Forms) to like to create a
custom ListView with a custom delegate, but quickly found that I'm not sure
how to propagate signal from delegate to ListView to expose it as the part
of custom ListView's API.
Probably I'm missing something, but what is the
Hello,
Have there been reports about layout issues with the native OS X "Aqua" style,
whether they use style (.ui) sheets or not?
We have been seeing layout errors in KDE applications when they use the Aqua
style, but not when they use any of the other installed style (KDE or Qt).
We were hopin
On Tuesday January 20 2015 08:14:21 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 January 2015 13:29:29 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> > >Is "mm" short for "mix and match"?…
>
> It's short for "Objective C++".
Hey, I didn't write that, Ian did! :)
If I had to make a choice, I'd pick ObjC++ as my favourite l
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 13:29:29 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> >Is "mm" short for "mix and match"?…
It's short for "Objective C++".
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
Inter
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 10:25:04 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> If the library is part of Qt itself then it will certainly not hurt, but
> nowadays we need to push all Qt submodules at the same time because there
> are runtime checks in order. Ie, I can't just package qtbase 5.3.
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 11:37:42 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> > The log wouldn't include the fact that there's a file that wasn't
> > installed
> > by MacPorts in the first place (unless it sends a file listing of the
> > entire system, which is a huge privacy and security nightmare).
>
> You know
On Tuesday January 20 2015 12:42:09 Rutledge Shawn wrote:
> Sounds good to me. Now that we are dropping 10.6 support, it ought to be
> easier.
Note that Carbon isn't required at all on 10.6, and "native" alternatives to
Carbon functions have probably been available since well before that OS ve
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 11:42:39 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Monday January 19 2015 23:06:05 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >On Monday 12 January 2015 09:09:08 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> >[snip]
> >Correct except for the packages that use Qt's private headers (please,
On Monday 19 January 2015 19:33:21 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Monday 19 January 2015 23:06:05 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> > Correct except for the packages that use Qt's private headers (please,
> > don't do that except you are writing code for Qt itself) and between the
> > dif
On Tuesday January 20 2015 12:42:09 Rutledge Shawn wrote:
> > One would probably start by rounding up all uses of Carbon calls. And query
> > the Qt devs to what extent they have a timeline for the migration.
> >
> > And one can only hope that a good part of the KDE4 functionality that
> > reli
On 20 Jan 2015, at 13:29, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Tuesday January 20 2015 12:56:50 Ian Wadham wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've made a number of patches to KDE4 that rely on
> that header, and KDE uses Carbon itself.
One hopes not, since Carbon is gone post-10.6 except for backwa
Hello,
I have a movie description which provides a number of text properties like
actors, producer, etc. plus a poster. In a short description of movie I'd
like to show only that number of properties (with text limited to a small
number of lines) which fit in the vertical area with the height as o
Den 20-01-2015 kl. 11:47 skrev René J.V. Bertin:
> On Monday January 19 2015 19:33:21 Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
>> By the way, I've been meaning to add a patch to Qt that would cause one
>> library to use a symbol from QtCore that has the exact Qt version number in
>> its ELF symbol. Would this help
19 matches
Mail list logo
