> -Original Message-
> From: interest-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
> [mailto:interest-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org]
> On Behalf Of m...@rpzdesign.com
> Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2014 2:41 PM
> To: Turunen Tuukka
> Cc: interest@qt-project.org
Even:
A couple months back you gave an intelligent answer from a interest list
query about
creating complex list views.
I was a little tied up with things and could not get around to actually
create a working example of a complex list view. Now is that time.
Maybe you could get me past some imp
I've built Qt 5.3.1 for Slack-current x86_64 [1] and 5.3.2 for
Slack-current x86 [2] sometime ago, based on its SlackBuild [3]
These builds are for my personal use, but you can try them (slack-current)
Alien Bob also have some builds on his KDE5 testing repo, take a look here
(x86_64) [4] or here
On Sunday November 16 2014 11:31:51 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Sunday 16 November 2014 10:58:01 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> > (I was arguing to do the same for KDE's global reference counting that used
> > a simple int ... and can cause the app to quit when the counter reaches 0
> > ...)
>
> You me
On Sunday 16 November 2014 10:58:01 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> (I was arguing to do the same for KDE's global reference counting that used
> a simple int ... and can cause the app to quit when the counter reaches 0
> ...)
You mean QEventLoopLocker?
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.c
On Sunday November 16 2014 18:46:50 Sean Harmer wrote:
> An atomic integer is used. See for e.g. QVector which uses QArrayData which
> in
> turn uses QtPrivate::RefCount which in turn uses QBasicAtomicInt.
Good, I was actually hoping to hear that :)
(I was arguing to do the same for KDE's globa
On Sunday 16 November 2014 19:02:19 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Sunday November 16 2014 18:47:34 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> > Most of the value classes are implicitly shared:
> >
> > http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5/implicit-sharing.html
>
> Yes, I saw that doc (also in Qt4). What kind of sharing
On Sunday November 16 2014 18:47:34 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> Most of the value classes are implicitly shared:
>
> http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5/implicit-sharing.html
>
Yes, I saw that doc (also in Qt4). What kind of sharing does this refer to -
across threads and/or only across owners in a
Il 16/11/2014 18:37, René J.V. Bertin ha scritto:
I thought Qt had support for reference counting (e.g. comparable to
ObjC's retain/release) but after checking a few likely suspect classes I
cannot seem to find anything of the sort.
Was I mistaken, or is it implemented in a different way?
Most
Hi,
I thought Qt had support for reference counting (e.g. comparable to ObjC's
retain/release) but after checking a few likely suspect classes I cannot seem
to find anything of the sort.
Was I mistaken, or is it implemented in a different way?
Cheers,
René
_
By the way, it is unclear when canvas gets repainted on requestPaint():
some time when it becomes visible or immediately?
2014-11-16 16:21 GMT+03:00 Dmitrii Volosnykh :
> Is such a behaviour is correct or this should be considered as a bug?
>
> onPaint handler gets triggered on requestPaint() and
Is such a behaviour is correct or this should be considered as a bug?
onPaint handler gets triggered on requestPaint() and markDirty(Qt.rect(0,
0, width, height)).
"if (!visible) return" guard works as a workaround.
Regards,
Dmitrii.
___
Interest maili
Yes, I saw it.
I just suggest to add and other way with inserting "port" and "user
name" for each time, since not for all can be acceptable adding to ssh
config.
But, ok, for me it is irrelevant (not a problem), keep all "as is".
15.11.2014 21:19, Marian Beermann пишет:
> Did you see the last
13 matches
Mail list logo
