On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Sze Howe Koh wrote:
> On 26 July 2013 12:57, Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Thiago Macieira <
> thiago.macie...@intel.com>
> >> int inc(int &foo)
> >> {
> >> return foo++; // not atomic anywhere
> >
> >
> > Why? Because of the way
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 25 de julho de 2013 13:40:55, Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
> > > If that increment was not atomically implemented (and to be honest,
> right
> > > now I don't know whether a "foo++" is atomic - I don't think it is, is
> > > it?)
>
Is it possible to set icons other than the "clean" icon? I would like to do
this but it doesn't appear that there is an easy way.
- Swyped from my droid.
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/inter
On quinta-feira, 25 de julho de 2013 13:40:55, Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
> > If that increment was not atomically implemented (and to be honest, right
> > now I don't know whether a "foo++" is atomic - I don't think it is, is
> > it?)
> > and again two threads
>
> Atomicity of foo++ would depend on th
Op 25-7-2013 10:15, Graham Labdon schreef:
Hi
As part of my application the user needs to be able to select from a
set of up to 64 options.
Any combination is allowed and I need a method of
selecting/de-selecting all of the options. As a starting point I am
showing (up to) 64 check boxes b
Hi
As part of my application the user needs to be able to select from a set of up
to 64 options.
Any combination is allowed and I need a method of selecting/de-selecting all of
the options. As a starting point I am showing (up to) 64 check boxes but by
default these are 'ticked' which does not l
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Till Oliver Knoll <
till.oliver.kn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the answer has already been given with regards to "mutable" and
> "const_cast", but at least I seem to have missed at least one reply (sent
> in private?) in this
>
No, no private replies to me at
I think the answer has already been given with regards to "mutable" and
"const_cast", but at least I seem to have missed at least one reply (sent in
private?) in this discussion. So here are my thoughts :)
Am 24.07.2013 um 09:29 schrieb Mandeep Sandhu :
> ...
> Also, doesn't a "const" (old sens
