Re: [Interest] Qwt and upgrading to Qt 5

2013-03-23 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sábado, 23 de março de 2013 17.56.18, Uwe Rathmann wrote: > > And will have definitely surpassed the old QWS > > server when the input method mechanism is integrated into Wayland in the > > next feature release. > > What we have is a touch, a couple of hard keys ( mapped to buttons ) and > an en

Re: [Interest] Qwt and upgrading to Qt 5

2013-03-23 Thread Uwe Rathmann
On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 09:25:11 -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > You may have heard stories about Wayland and whether it's ready for > desktop usage. That's irrelevant... it's ready for embedded use already > and has been for a year. I have to make a platform decision ( unrelated to Qwt ) in the fol

Re: [Interest] Upgrade to Qt 5 -- pros and cons?

2013-03-23 Thread Rick Stockton
On 03/22/2013 05:11 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sexta-feira, 22 de março de 2013 18.58.50, K. Frank wrote: >> But it's interesting that nobody really put forth any functional benefits >> of Qt 5 in the widget / desktop space. > There hasn't been any new work done on the widgets, besides general

Re: [Interest] Interest Digest, Vol 18, Issue 62

2013-03-23 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sábado, 23 de março de 2013 15.40.47, Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > What you said is contradictory with both the doc from Qt 4.8 (see > http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8/qhostaddress.html) and with my tests. > Using QHostAddress::Any, my server does not listen to IPv6 (tested

Re: [Interest] Qwt and upgrading to Qt 5

2013-03-23 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sábado, 23 de março de 2013 15.02.03, Uwe Rathmann wrote: > > There is no QWS in Qt 5. It's replaced with QPA. > > But when comparing QPA/5.0 with QWS/4.8, what does it mean in terms of > improvement/regression for a user today ? I think the most important two differences are: - QPA supports

Re: [Interest] Qwt and upgrading to Qt 5

2013-03-23 Thread Uwe Rathmann
>> I'm not using X11 at the moment, so it doesn't matter much to me, >> but this sounds like a significant issue. > > Note that you will *not* see that regression if you're coming from Qt > 4.8. The raster engine is the default in 4.8 already. The native engine > was default in 4.7 and before. Hm

Re: [Interest] Qt builds

2013-03-23 Thread Soroush R
Hello Алексей MySQL C connector on x86_64 is known to be not working duo to an ABI break. Qt 5.0.0 compiles and links against it successfully, though crashes at runtime. I've had so many troubles with compile C connector version 6 using MinGW. How is yours? Does it really work? On Wed, Mar 20,

Re: [Interest] Interest Digest, Vol 18, Issue 62

2013-03-23 Thread Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal
Hi Thiago, What you said is contradictory with both the doc from Qt 4.8 (see http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8/qhostaddress.html) and with my tests. Using QHostAddress::Any, my server does not listen to IPv6 (tested with both my client app and with netcat) while it does with AnyIPv6 (it worked agai

Re: [Interest] Qt3D Qt5 Angle

2013-03-23 Thread Ramakanthreddy_Kesireddy
Hi, Good to know Qt3D is shaping up well in Qt 5.2. Please let me know if QTBUG-28620(3d text) will be part of the same release. Thanks and Regards, Ramakanth From: interest-bounces+ramakanthreddy_kesireddy=mahindrasatyam@qt-project.org [interest-bou

[Interest] Qt3d examples openGL resources cleanup error

2013-03-23 Thread Ramakanthreddy_Kesireddy
Hi, When we run sample examples in Quick3d like monkeygod and animations_qml, it is throwing below errror i.e. OpenGL resources are not cleaned up. We are getting same error in our application using Qt3d 2.0(Quick3d) Texture 'file:///home/ubuntu/qt/qt-gst/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-5.0.0/qt3d