Re: [Interest] Heavily Commented Example: Simple Single Frontend with Two Backends

2012-10-21 Thread Till Oliver Knoll
Am 22.10.2012 um 07:21 schrieb d3fault : >> ...If you only need to read from the serial port periodically, you can set >> your backend up like I did for backend2 in the exampe... which also uses a >> timer. >> If that implies getting rid of a 2nd "polling thread" entirely then that's something

[Interest] Qt/Qml - Sample GLShaderProgram with animation on uPosition

2012-10-21 Thread Satya Praveen Ganapathi
Hi, Could you please provide the example program for GLShaderProgram with animation on OpacityMap uPosition . Thanks & Regards, Satya ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Re: [Interest] Heavily Commented Example: Simple Single Frontend with Two Backends

2012-10-21 Thread Bo Thorsen
Den 21-10-2012 23:46, d3fault skrev: On Oct 21, 2012 11:02 AM, "Bo Thorsen" > wrote: > > If you set out to correct the documentation, you should make it better, > not go from one one-sided way of thinking to another. > What? Are we talking about the same thing? 9

Re: [Interest] Heavily Commented Example: Simple Single Frontend with Two Backends

2012-10-21 Thread Bo Thorsen
Den 22-10-2012 03:38, Syam Krishnan skrev: On 10/22/2012 03:16 AM, d3fault wrote: On Oct 21, 2012 11:02 AM, "Bo Thorsen" > wrote: > > If you set out to correct the documentation, you should make it better, > not go from one one-sided way of thinking to another. >

Re: [Interest] Heavily Commented Example: Simple Single Frontend with Two Backends

2012-10-21 Thread d3fault
guh sorry wrong list mfw 2012 and we still have to change that On Oct 21, 2012 10:20 PM, "d3fault" wrote: > volatile bools work, but just know that every time you check it you are > doing a non-cached memory read (relatively slow). It can't read from the > cache/registers (much faster) because ot

Re: [Interest] Heavily Commented Example: Simple Single Frontend with Two Backends

2012-10-21 Thread Syam Krishnan
On 10/22/2012 03:16 AM, d3fault wrote: On Oct 21, 2012 11:02 AM, "Bo Thorsen" wrote: > > If you set out to correct the documentation, you should make it better, > not go from one one-sided way of thinking to

Re: [Interest] Heavily Commented Example: Simple Single Frontend with Two Backends

2012-10-21 Thread d3fault
On Oct 21, 2012 11:02 AM, "Bo Thorsen" wrote: > > If you set out to correct the documentation, you should make it better, > not go from one one-sided way of thinking to another. > What? Are we talking about the same thing? 99% of the time, implementing QThread and overriding run() is not what the

Re: [Interest] Heavily Commented Example: Simple Single Frontend with Two Backends

2012-10-21 Thread Bo Thorsen
Den 21-10-2012 09:16, d3fault skrev: > 1) To be a good starting/reference point for Qt beginners. I'm trying > to combat the misinformation on how to use QThreads that the outdated > docs have embedded into so many brains. There's nothing wrong with doing that, but it would be even better to subm

Re: [Interest] Qt 5 and Mac App Store

2012-10-21 Thread Till Oliver Knoll
Am 19.10.2012 um 18:46 schrieb Chris Meyer : >>> I've opted not to make >>> the intrusive changes (for now) that have little or no benefit to an >>> end user, and probably are in fact detrimental to usability. >> >> How so? The users would not know about what is going on under the >> hood: they

Re: [Interest] Qt 5 and Mac App Store

2012-10-21 Thread Till Oliver Knoll
Am 19.10.2012 um 18:20 schrieb Daniel Price : > >> Ah, okay then, but still: if your application *wanted* to be malicious and, >> say, delete the file the user has such selected via file dialog, ... > > Hmm I'm pretty sure that sandboxing is there to prevent *you* from doing > thing's not yo