Re: [Interest] Qt Licensing

2012-05-06 Thread Preet
The licensing terms are available here: http://qt-project.org/products/licensing You can either use Qt freely under the LGPL, or with the commercial license offered by Digia (http://www.digia.com/en/Qt/License-Agreements/) which you need to purchase. On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Ankit Agarwal

Re: [Interest] Qt Licensing

2012-05-06 Thread alexander golks
Am Mon, 7 May 2012 11:02:37 +0530 schrieb Ankit Agarwal : > Hi, > > We are a group of software engineer building a software to be deployed > commercially at the client's locations in Windows platform. As I understand > that if we are using Qt4.8, then we may not have to buy the Qt Commercial > li

[Interest] Qt Licensing

2012-05-06 Thread Ankit Agarwal
Hi, We are a group of software engineer building a software to be deployed commercially at the client's locations in Windows platform. As I understand that if we are using Qt4.8, then we may not have to buy the Qt Commercial license. Please correct me if I am wrong. -- Regards, Ankit Agarwal

Re: [Interest] Building Qt for debugging - libwebcore.a File format not recognized

2012-05-06 Thread Carl L Schumann
On May 6, 2012, at 3:29 AM, Alexander Semke wrote: > Hi, > >> This resulted in the following error when Makefile.WebKit.QtWebKit tried >> to build libQtWebKit.so.4.9.0: > > From qt-webkit docu: > > "Note: Building the QtWebKit module with debugging symbols is problematic on > many platforms d

Re: [Interest] Building Qt for debugging - libwebcore.a File format not recognized

2012-05-06 Thread Alexander Semke
Hi, > This resulted in the following error when Makefile.WebKit.QtWebKit tried > to build libQtWebKit.so.4.9.0: >From qt-webkit docu: "Note: Building the QtWebKit module with debugging symbols is problematic on many platforms due to the size of the WebKit engine. We recommend building the modu